Eskimonio
Newly Enlightened
- Joined
- Feb 9, 2007
- Messages
- 135
Bat,
It's not yet dark here, but I don't even think it's going to be close.
That Brinkmann 3w 3xAAA is one of the brighter lights I own, and I'm sure it will win hands down.
***SCREECH !!!! ***
I just took them both outside (there is only minimal ambient light outside now) and the stock of this single AA just went up a notch.
At 15' distance, the spill was similar in diameter for both lights. The Brinkmann has a hotspot that measures appx 1 foot dia at 15', and is easily 2 or 3x as bright as the hotspot of the MTE, which is appx 2.5-3' in diameter and is much more nebulous, not as crisp a hotspot as the Brinkmann. * Disclaimer: this is all to my untrained and very subjective eye. *
Truthfully, they may put out similar overall light per a measurement device, but it's difficult to discern, since the MTE's hotspot is larger, but less bright.
The output of the little MTE has just impressed me...I thought the 3w would summarily win, and it might have, but the race was much closer than I thought it would be when I had begun typing this reply.
** additional info
With assistance, from 15' I measured spills on the MTE and Brink 3w. MTE has spill diameter of appx 15' whereas Brink 3W had spill diam of 13'. I used my gf as a measurement baseline and since she's 5'11", my spill #s are pretty accurate. So it looks like the spill of the MTE is wider in diameter than the Brink, but less bright. The photo below and my subjective interpretations above are using freshly charged ROV Hybrid batteries.
** Edit **
Please forgive me, this is my first attempt at doing a beamshot of any kind...my photography needs big work, but in an effort to give further comparison, this is my attempt:
Low Left = L0D-CE on HIGH
Up Center = MTE SSC w/Seoul
Low Right = Brinkmann 3W 3xAAA (grey w/black plastic purch @ Target)
Flashlights held @ 15 feet away from wall...spills are not well represented here, but I have given diameters above.
It's not yet dark here, but I don't even think it's going to be close.
That Brinkmann 3w 3xAAA is one of the brighter lights I own, and I'm sure it will win hands down.
***SCREECH !!!! ***
I just took them both outside (there is only minimal ambient light outside now) and the stock of this single AA just went up a notch.
At 15' distance, the spill was similar in diameter for both lights. The Brinkmann has a hotspot that measures appx 1 foot dia at 15', and is easily 2 or 3x as bright as the hotspot of the MTE, which is appx 2.5-3' in diameter and is much more nebulous, not as crisp a hotspot as the Brinkmann. * Disclaimer: this is all to my untrained and very subjective eye. *
Truthfully, they may put out similar overall light per a measurement device, but it's difficult to discern, since the MTE's hotspot is larger, but less bright.
The output of the little MTE has just impressed me...I thought the 3w would summarily win, and it might have, but the race was much closer than I thought it would be when I had begun typing this reply.
** additional info
With assistance, from 15' I measured spills on the MTE and Brink 3w. MTE has spill diameter of appx 15' whereas Brink 3W had spill diam of 13'. I used my gf as a measurement baseline and since she's 5'11", my spill #s are pretty accurate. So it looks like the spill of the MTE is wider in diameter than the Brink, but less bright. The photo below and my subjective interpretations above are using freshly charged ROV Hybrid batteries.
** Edit **
Please forgive me, this is my first attempt at doing a beamshot of any kind...my photography needs big work, but in an effort to give further comparison, this is my attempt:
Low Left = L0D-CE on HIGH
Up Center = MTE SSC w/Seoul
Low Right = Brinkmann 3W 3xAAA (grey w/black plastic purch @ Target)
Flashlights held @ 15 feet away from wall...spills are not well represented here, but I have given diameters above.
Last edited: