...I dont think a light would have made a difference.
All else being equal on the presumption nothing was race motivated, I think a flashlight WOULD have made a difference.
...I dont think a light would have made a difference.
But I see tinder and increasing heat, and I don't see it ending any other way than in flames.
All else being equal on the presumption nothing was race motivated, I think a flashlight WOULD have made a difference.
apparently Trayvon Martin wasn't the kind of person who would take off running just to avoid a fight.
I understand where you're coming from, but I think in that case Martin would've been viewed as a heat-packing hoodlum and Zimmerman's self-supposed status as a card-carrying Good Samaritan would've been confirmed. I think the scenario you described would just confirm the notion behind the SYG law, that if you think someone's up to no good, they probably are, and you should respond as though you know for sure. I think that would've made SYG laws even more popular.StarHalo said:If Trayvon also produced a handgun and each shot the other dead on site, I wonder if there would be so much enthusiasm for the Stand Your Ground law; perhaps then the view that Zimmerman should have remained in his car would be more popular.
The real problem in this case was not the lack of good lighting, it was the Stand Your Ground law. It allows people to shoot suspected aggressors without ever attempting to de-escalate the situation even a little bit. Merely taking a couple steps back is enough to determine if another person is an aggressor, because an aggressor will step forward when you step back. That symbolic gesture of not wanting to get in a fight doesn't increase risk for the defender at all, and it allows the defender to assess whether the other person really does want to get into a fight. That information is enough to justify deadly force if necessary, but allowing people to shoot other people just because of bad mojo is unacceptable in civilized society.
It appears that the neighborhood watch Captain was attacked
I don't think a flashlight would've made much difference. The local police said that Zimmerman had repeatedly called them to report suspicious activity and the suspects were always young black males. He may not have intended to be racist, but he was certainly behaving like one. He saw a black kid, decided the kid was up to no good, and confronted him.
he nor anyone else is required to be so timid and fearful in their own neighborhood or anywhere else in America, that they have to go sit in their car and lose sight of what they perceive as suspicious activity.
Zimmerman was naturally already armed, like me he is a CCL holder, he was also the neighborhood watch captain, who's duty was to observe suspicious behavior, he also needed the address where this was happening.
On CNN there is a story with George Zimmerman recounting the events that tragic night.
He was quoted on a before unreleased recording as saying.....words along the lines of I wanted to see what was around corner...."I had a flashlight, but it was dead"
It would be difficult to categorically conclude that a functioning O Light M 20, for example would have altered the outcome, yet a high powered light used at the right time, right situation COULD MAYBE PERHAPS have made a difference.... if nothing other than facilitating separation of the individuals before the fight occurred.
This is yet another reason to make sure cells are fresh on EDC light prior to an evening excursion.