A battery fuelled by air

cy

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 20, 2003
Messages
8,186
Location
USA
Running on air... A cheaper, lighter and longer-lasting alternative to modern batteries

mobilbatt.JPG


MOBILE phones looked like bricks in the 1980s. Indeed, they were so cumbersome that most were installed in cars. That was because the batteries required to power them were so hefty. When lithium-ion batteries were invented, mobile phones became small enough to be carried in a pocket or slipped into a handbag. Now a new design of battery that uses oxygen from ambient air to power devices could provide even smaller and lighter sources of power. Not only that, such batteries would be cheaper and last for longer between charges.

Lithium-ion batteries have two electrodes immersed in an electrically conductive solution, called an electrolyte. One of the electrodes, the cathode, is made of lithium cobalt oxide; the other, the anode, is composed of carbon. When the battery is being charged, positively charged lithium ions break away from the cathode and travel in the electrolyte to the anode, where they meet electrons brought there by a charging device. When electricity is needed, the anode releases the lithium ions, which rapidly move back to the cathode. As they do so, the electrons that were paired with them in the anode during the charging process are released. These electrons travel around an external circuit to which the battery is attached and power it.

Peter Bruce and his colleagues at the University of St Andrews in Scotland came up with the idea of replacing the lithium cobalt oxide electrode with a cheaper and lighter alternative. They designed an electrode made from porous carbon and lithium oxide. They knew that lithium oxide forms naturally from lithium ions, electrons and oxygen, but, to their surprise, they found that it could also be made to separate easily when an electric current passed through it. They exposed one side of their porous carbon electrode to an electrolyte rich in lithium ions and put a mesh window on the other side of the electrode through which air could be drawn. Oxygen from the air took the place of the cobalt oxide.

When they charged their battery, the lithium ions migrated to the anode where they combined with electrons from the charging device. When they discharged it, lithium ions and electrons were released from the anode. The ions crossed the electrolyte and the electrons travelled round the external circuit. The ions and electrons then met at the cathode, where they combined with the oxygen to form lithium oxide that filled the pores in the carbon.

Because the oxygen being used by the battery comes from the surrounding air rather than having to be carried around inside the battery, the device that Dr Bruce's team has designed can be a mere one-eighth to one-tenth the size and weight of modern batteries, while still carrying the same charge. Alternatively, batteries using the new technology would last eight to ten times longer than modern batteries of the same size.

Performance and size are not the only expected improvements. Although they are not yet commercially available, making such a battery is expected to be cheaper. Lithium cobalt oxide accounts for 30% of the cost of a lithium-ion battery. Air, however, is free.

http://www.economist.com/science/tm/displayStory.cfm?story_id=13766515&source=hptextfeature
 
MOBILE phones looked like bricks in the 1980s. Indeed, they were so cumbersome that most were installed in cars. That was because the batteries required to power them were so hefty.
Actually, batteries are less than half the reason why mobile phones were so large. We've shrunk down the size of ICs since then while giving them ever more functionality. Microprocessors can do more and more with less and less power. The mobile phone back then may have used LED or vacuum fluorescent displays. Nowadays we use more efficient LCD screens. And more sensitive receivers mean less transmitting power is needed than 25 years ago. ALL of these factors have combined to make more and more devices (not just phones) mobile and self-powered compared to even 5 years ago. The better batteries of today are only a small part of the story.

A great analogy is to look at today's flashlights. For any given size form factor I'd say the product of lumens and runtime is about 20 times what it was 25 years ago. I can attribute a factor of 2 or 3 to the better batteries of today. The remainder (a factor of 7 to 10) is due to the much more efficient light emitters at our disposal. We can get in excess of 100 lm/W with today's LEDs compared to 10 or 15 lm/W with the incandescents of 25 years ago.

Lithium cobalt oxide accounts for 30% of the cost of a lithium-ion battery. Air, however, is free.
At least until some politician decides to tax the air the new batteries use.
 
http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/ja056811q
pictures.

looks like if it was possible to Recharge, the size wouldnt change for the better needing a porus plate not to mention to air venting. the capacity wouldnt change much , but the weight would, assuming the decay of the plates wouldnt be a major factor. and the "durability" of it would change drastically as a porus grid for a plate would be easier to damage.

looks promising, mostly for automobile stuff wherein lots of money for the technology advances in battery is comming from.
 
Last edited:
that and mobile phones of long ago, were very high powered devices with much distance between transmitting towers, now with towers cropping up everywhere, the distance that a cell phone works is actually much smaller than the OLD school stuff.
still cant get a signal where I want to be mobile :)
 
Batteries that use oxygen from the air as an active material have been around for decades.
They range from very small cells used to power hearing aids, up to very large batteries often used for electric fences.
Such cells are best suited to moderate, continous drains such as would be imposed by hearing aids and electric fences.
These cells are supplied sealed and are put to use by removing an airtight seal or cover. Once this has been done they start to discharge, even if no current is being drawn.

Such cells are not normally rechargeable, a version was produced some years ago, but suffered from high cost and limited cycle life.
 
Top