Hi guys,
I have been trying to get to this and finally said screw it and put some other stuff aside.....
The image below shows the same LE (DB917 on 2x123) used in three stock production heads, Aleph 2, Aleph 1 and then Aleph 3. The target was at one meter and relative lux measurements were also taken at one meter.
Exterior distant shots would provide much better
"real world" information but that will need to be addressed later. Most interesting to me is the comparison of the 27 mm with the 38 mm since the 38 mm is essentially a 27 mm with additional reflective surface added as an extended skirt, if you will. You can actually see the 27's beam in the 38's shot but you can also see where additional spill light (not visible in the beam shots; beyond the frame) has been redirected by the 38 giving it a more intense and concentrated center in the focused beam as well as added additional light to the corona. In the middle strip where I increased the amount of light shown, the 27 mm has the illusion of being a brighter beam because of the greater fall off of light beyond the center beam. If you look closely or crop just the center, you can see that this is not really the case. I believe that adding more depth and additional reflective surface to any parabolic reflector will just enhance the beam but of course at the expense of a larger head.
Ironically, if size were no issue, one could argue for going with an Aleph 3 and Aleph 1 for flood and throw and leave out the Aleph 2. However the Aleph 2 is a prett reasonable compromise taking from both of the other two. The 20 m and 27 mm reflectors are almost identical in height but since the 20 is a smaller parabolic curve and has a smaller diameter at exit, it redirects more overall light than the 27 mm does. This can be seen if you consider the density of light in the full frame that is shown.
EDIT: It was pointed out that I mis identified the heads in a couple sentences above (thanks Darell) so I think I have fixed the post now. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif
ADDED:
Beam shot: relative comparison with 5W LED:
NOTE: The cloor balance was on auto and in both beam shot comparisons, the tint was not off to the naked eye to any extent near what these images imply.
I have been trying to get to this and finally said screw it and put some other stuff aside.....
The image below shows the same LE (DB917 on 2x123) used in three stock production heads, Aleph 2, Aleph 1 and then Aleph 3. The target was at one meter and relative lux measurements were also taken at one meter.
Exterior distant shots would provide much better
"real world" information but that will need to be addressed later. Most interesting to me is the comparison of the 27 mm with the 38 mm since the 38 mm is essentially a 27 mm with additional reflective surface added as an extended skirt, if you will. You can actually see the 27's beam in the 38's shot but you can also see where additional spill light (not visible in the beam shots; beyond the frame) has been redirected by the 38 giving it a more intense and concentrated center in the focused beam as well as added additional light to the corona. In the middle strip where I increased the amount of light shown, the 27 mm has the illusion of being a brighter beam because of the greater fall off of light beyond the center beam. If you look closely or crop just the center, you can see that this is not really the case. I believe that adding more depth and additional reflective surface to any parabolic reflector will just enhance the beam but of course at the expense of a larger head.
Ironically, if size were no issue, one could argue for going with an Aleph 3 and Aleph 1 for flood and throw and leave out the Aleph 2. However the Aleph 2 is a prett reasonable compromise taking from both of the other two. The 20 m and 27 mm reflectors are almost identical in height but since the 20 is a smaller parabolic curve and has a smaller diameter at exit, it redirects more overall light than the 27 mm does. This can be seen if you consider the density of light in the full frame that is shown.
EDIT: It was pointed out that I mis identified the heads in a couple sentences above (thanks Darell) so I think I have fixed the post now. /ubbthreads/images/graemlins/blush.gif
ADDED:
Beam shot: relative comparison with 5W LED:
NOTE: The cloor balance was on auto and in both beam shot comparisons, the tint was not off to the naked eye to any extent near what these images imply.