[ QUOTE ]
James S said:Mednanu, am I right in thinking that even a regular old electricity producing reactor is still a breeder in the sense that it creates plutonium in the uranium fuel rods? A "breeder" reactor is one that doesn't waste any energy making electricity and concentrates just on transforming the metals.
[/ QUOTE ]Yes and no. While a regular reactor will produce Pu as a byproduct, it's not tuned for this job. The amount of Pu waste produced will be much, much lower than that of a 'Breeder' reactor wherein all of the reaction is largely used to produce plutonium instead of being devoted to power generation. It's sort of the same analogy as saying that all speakers are also microphones. While true, certain ones are tuned to picking up sound while others are tuned to broadcasting it. After all, you'd probably prefer to listen to your stereo from a nice pair of Ramsa's™, than out of a cheap radio shack microphone ( which, technically speaking, is also a speaker). Conversely, you generally see famous muscians using multi-thousand dollar microphones while in the studio, rather than singing into a pair of Walkman headphones. Each are specifically tuned to the purpose for which they've been built. And while each technically can do each other's jobs ( all speakers are microphones, and vice-versa ), the results become obvious that some are meant to be used for a specific purpose.
So to bring it back to the breader, non-breader scenario. Yes, all reactors produce Plutonium as a byproduct, but breader reactors do this as their sole purpose and produce a LOT of Plutonium very efficiently, compared to a non-breader reactor which produces much, much, much less. The problem with the ones that we gave to N. Korea is that they can EASILY be converted into breader reactors, whereas there were other design configurations which we could have just as easily given to them that could not have been readily or efficiently converted into bomb-grade-producing Plutonium factories, but would have only been efficient for power generation instead.