Taking another look at this with the results I got from my experiment today, it could simply be that the module itself has too much resistance.i have a direct drive sst-90 by nb . im useing imr 26650 orange battery im getting 2.55 amps at the tail is that right. the cell is charged to 4.12 volts with a pila charger. thanks jv
Sounds like a pain to charge. But I'm guessing these squishy P60 size switches simply aren't designed to handle such a high current.This was not a drop-in but I got about 9.7-9.9 amps direct driving an sst-90 using 8 eneloops configured for ~4.8V (actual was 5.2V)
I'm not sure about using 2 CR123s in a direct drive setup. DD will pretty much suck out all the juice in no time at all. It's much more cost effective to use rechargables, even if you have to pay over $10 per battery and buy a separate charger for it.I have an SST-90 3D Mag running off 4 NiMH C cells (lambda Varapower2000) which is direct drive.
With 4.1v via 3 NiMH D cells = 2.2A at the tail
It does 10A with 4 NiMH C cells, which is how it was designed.
You can use up to 6v on most of Nailbenders direct drive modules. I would try 2 CR123 primaries or get a Fivemega 3C hosts and run 3 NiMH C cells. In fact, you might be able to get the 1.6V C cell rechargeable ones..NiZn.
bigC
And the past month people have been telling me that heat would be the limiting factor.
Well actually, 5-6 amps would have been absolute gold for me. 9 amps was only something I'd be interested in if I planned on shocking the LED to lower the Vf. But if I were able to achieve that kind of current flow with my host, then it would completely defeat the point of doing the burn-in in the first place.Just wait until you install a switch that can handle the current, then make all of the necessary resistance reductions to achieve the 9+A that you're after; I think you will see just how much of a limiting factor heat can be:thumbsup:.
I believe we do.
Do I smell another Moddoo masterpiece?