Flashlight lens, transmission efficiency?

Yes, but most of the loss is due to reflections therefore the need for anti reflective coatings.
 
No. Assuming identical material. the index of refraction is the same. The index of refraction in a vacuum is 1.000, air about 1.0003, distilled water about 1.33and the types of glass we use in flashlight windows about 1.5-1.6. The depth of the material, assuming a pure and consistent medium is not a factor.

While logic would tell us that a 2mm window is twice as thick as a 1mm window and therefore must block more light, we need to relate this "double" thickness to the wavelength of visible light.

Visible light is in the wavelength range of 400-750nm. A nanometer is equal to 10-6 mm. So the wavelength of the visible light we care about is so short that the difference between a 1mm or 2mm window is irrelevant.

Significant loss is caused by internal reflection between the 2 surfaces of the glass. The behavior of this incident light will cause a loss of transmitted light through the window. Surface coatings or multi coatings can greatly reduce this factor but not eliminate it.

Mark
 
Last edited:
Of course there is a dependence on amount of absorption vs thickness. Google Beer-Lambert Law.
 
Curious... do thinner lenses obstruct less light than thicker ones (all else being equal)?
Yes, but light loss due to absorption in the glass on the order of ~mm thickness is insignificant compared to the ~4% reflected from the front and back air-glass interfaces.

Note that while these multiple reflections (for uncoated glass) cause 8% of the incident light to be reflected, this does not necessarily mean 8% lumen loss. In many cases, some of that light will bounce off the reflectors again, then eventually make it back out again as diffuse sidespill.
 
Top