There was a guy on Dragons' Den (UK program where inventors look for funding from speculative investors) trying to get funding for research into what he called an "H2O battery" - what he had is at the bottom of http://www.simplyradios.com/acatalog/H2O.html, which he said was the 2nd generation model - he was looking for funding to research the 4th generation version. Just wondering if anybody here knows anything about it - from what I can work out it seems to be a sacrificial electrode device?
Was quite strange seeing his presentation and the reactions. He very much gave the impression that the energy was coming from the water itself, without saying so explicitly - no mention of electrodes being used up or anything like that. Also he was after funding to research a model which would allow higher current draw than the trickle which was possible with this. Now most of the Dragons obviously didn't have a scientific background, and so didn't particularly dispute his science. However the one that did tore him to shreds - basically accused him of trying to pull the wool over their eyes - a sentiment I agreed with. He very much denied this afterwards, from which I can only assume he didn't understand the science himself and was simply a marketing guy who believed the line somebody else had fed him.
Anybody else see this and think he was trying to sell a perpetual motion machine?
Was quite strange seeing his presentation and the reactions. He very much gave the impression that the energy was coming from the water itself, without saying so explicitly - no mention of electrodes being used up or anything like that. Also he was after funding to research a model which would allow higher current draw than the trickle which was possible with this. Now most of the Dragons obviously didn't have a scientific background, and so didn't particularly dispute his science. However the one that did tore him to shreds - basically accused him of trying to pull the wool over their eyes - a sentiment I agreed with. He very much denied this afterwards, from which I can only assume he didn't understand the science himself and was simply a marketing guy who believed the line somebody else had fed him.
Anybody else see this and think he was trying to sell a perpetual motion machine?