Huge leaps in incan performance/size ratio in the near future...

mdocod

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 9, 2005
Messages
7,544
Location
COLORado spRINGs
Not from new bulbs, nope...

Batteries, but I'm posting this here (in the incan forum) as I'm just brainstorming some new possibilities and the discussion excitement that can be fired up as a result of this is more related to what incan possibilities there are as a result of the new batteries, rather than the new cell itself. (I think)

Originally, AW posted some charts and graphs about his new cells in LuxLuthors safe chemistry shootout here:
http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=205814&highlight=limn

And then I was reading this thread:
http://www.candlepowerforums.com/vb/showthread.php?t=207646

Mark@LF spilled the beans about an RCR123 size LiMN chemistry cell. Sounds like AW might have this in the works, I am very curious as to whether there are any MORE sizes in the works besides the 18650 and RCR123 that have already been "leaked." I may just have to contact AW and see if he would be willing to share some more information on what other sizes we can expect....

This could really put some serious leverage back on the incan side for awhile. As many of you may know, LiMn is the chemistry found in "safe" chemistry li-ion cells in many popular new power tools. They are currently being manufactured by a number of companies, Molicel, Sanyo, and Sony, and likely others that have yet to be identified. 18650s and 26650 sizes are pretty common in power tools and not too hard to get ahold of. Sounds like AW will be bringing his own brand to the table, and based on pictures he has already posted, it appears that he is shooting for a complete consumer style cell with button top and all.

For those who don't already know, a LiMN secondary cell is basically a 3.7V rechargeable cell, just like a "normal" cobalt chemistry cell, but who's chemistry is more stable, and more tolerant of abuse, and of lower internal resistance. They charge up to ~4.10-4.20V (depending on specific flavor of cell type) and can pretty much always be charged on a conventional li-ion single or multi-slot loose cell charger provided it is designed for 3.7V li-ion cells. I'm assuming that the specific chemistry AW will be using would follow this same charging guideline (just guessing here)...

Anyways, these cells can handle serious current output. Usually to the tune of 10C or greater, but tend to have about 30% less energy density compared with liCo cells (cobalt chemistry cells). What this means is that, IN THEORY, we could be pushing many very high powered bulbs, with a handful of very small cells. Yes runtime will be short, but this opens up some new design possibilities worth looking at...

Here's some of the more obvious, and maybe some less obvious options that come to mind:

----------------------

1xLiMn RCR123

A 1xCR123 "P60"/"D-26" compatible host with any 3.7V incan lamp, (HO-4, EO-4, WE 3.7V, G&P 3.7V, etc etc)

A 1xCR123 LED light, modified to a P7 emitter, direct drive from this RCR123 (safely, and probably as bright as similar 1x18650 mods that people have done)... (yea, I know it's the incan forum, but this cell will break some new ground in this one LED area also, might as well mention it).

----------------------

2xLiMn RCR123:

A 2xCR123 "P60"/"D-26" compatible host, running ANY lamp ordinarily reserved for larger pairs of li-ion cells. That includes the EO-9, P91, FMs 1794 w/D26 bi-pin module.

A 2xCR123 host with "SF M head" (converted, or otherwise), with Z46 bezel, running the HO-M3, EO-M3, or MN11

A 2xCR123 host with SF turbo-head installed, running The MN16, MN20, HO-M3T, EO-M3T, or, possibly even the MN21 (depends), or with the FM bi-pin to MN socket, a WA111, 5761 (maybe), and many other bi-pin bulbs ordinarily ran on 2x larger li-ion cells.

----------------------

3xLiMn RCR123

Want to turn your M3T (or equivalent lego) into an 1185? Here's your chance. Need an FM bi-pin >MN socket.

here's an easy one: HO-M6R in M3T.

----------------------

4xLiMN RCR123

overdrive a 12V G4 base bi-pin lamp that fits in a SF turbo reflector in an FM>Bi-Pin to MN socket. This could be done in a M4 (or equivalent lego) or an M6 (with the 2x18650 adapter, just laod RCR123s in it instead).

----------------------

lets see, things get interesting now....

----------------------

6xLiMn RCR123


1.5D cut-down tri-bored mag, cells in a 3-abreast configuration, wired series, should be able to safely achieve 60W+ modifications. Not sure about specific bulb recomendations, but there are probably a number of 12V long life halogens that would work, may need a soft start or minor regulation.

----------------------

Ok... that's enough brain storming for me now... I don't want to start getting into all the options that could be done with other size cells until I have some confirmation of those cell sizes coming to fruition :)

Ok- one teaser idea based on cells I have no idea about, a 64458 (or something similar) running on 6 17500s in a tri-bore 2D with regulation. 100+W 2D mags will have some more options open up, even approaching 200W.

If you have any ideas, thoughts, I'd love to hear em :)

Eric
 
Excellent news, very useful thread.

I PM'd AW earlier today, and he replied that the new IMR-RCR123s will be available in 2-3 weeks time (mid Oct).
 
I am very curious as to whether there are any MORE sizes in the works besides the 18650 and RCR123 that have already been "leaked." I may just have to contact AW and see if he would be willing to share some more information on what other sizes we can expect....

AW has indicated that 18650 and rcr123 sizes are not far away and that D cells are in the works.
 
I like the idea of a 1.5 cut down tri mag powering a 12V bulb, now that will be car headlight teritory and would like to see D size cells coming into this new chemstry
 
----------------------

1xLiMn RCR123

A 1xCR123 "P60"/"D-26" compatible host with any 3.7V incan lamp, (HO-4, EO-4, WE 3.7V, G&P 3.7V, etc etc)

A 1xCR123 LED light, modified to a P7 emitter, direct drive from this RCR123 (safely, and probably as bright as similar 1x18650 mods that people have done)... (yea, I know it's the incan forum, but this cell will break some new ground in this one LED area also, might as well mention it).

----------------------

2xLiMn RCR123:

A 2xCR123 "P60"/"D-26" compatible host, running ANY lamp ordinarily reserved for larger pairs of li-ion cells. That includes the EO-9, P91, FMs 1794 w/D26 bi-pin module.

A 2xCR123 host with "SF M head" (converted, or otherwise), with Z46 bezel, running the HO-M3, EO-M3, or MN11

A 2xCR123 host with SF turbo-head installed, running The MN16, MN20, HO-M3T, EO-M3T, or, possibly even the MN21 (depends), or with the FM bi-pin to MN socket, a WA111, 5761 (maybe), and many other bi-pin bulbs ordinarily ran on 2x larger li-ion cells.

----------------------


The above two options would be supremely awsome :rock:
 
Sounds very interesting........now, a practical question. What is the pro's and con's compared to the existing Li-ion range of cells from the RCR123 to the 18650 and "C" cells and even the "D" cells.

In other words, when should I choose the 2x Li-ion 18650's and when should I choose the new 2x 18650's.......and what would be the expected run times for say 6P 2x new RCR123's with EO-9 or P91?
 
Anytime I mention over in the LED forum how new battery technology will improve incans and eventually make runtime a non-issue people think I'm crazy. :whistle:
 
Well this could be very interesting for me when they come out. I am currently using an EO-9 in my 6P with 2 AW's and its bright as hell, but i am worried about anything happening so i havent run it for more than 6 seconds at a time now. I am definitely gonna get on the list of first buyers for some of these LiMN RCR123A batteries. :popcorn:
 
D cells will be freakin' sweet. :devil:

And RCR123's for high power + compact w/ short runtime won't be too bad either. I also wouldn't mind 14500 size if possible. A Quad bored D M@g with some of those babies sounds pretty nice too. :D
 
Thanks for opening a new thread on this topic, Eric. :)

Huge leaps in incan performance/size ratio in the near future...
Not from new bulbs, nope...

Batteries

Well, you are only half right there.
Batteries will be a "Great" leap, but with bulbs that are specially designed for them, now that's "Huge" leap. :twothumbs

We are doing our part in this evolution, as I said before, it will be a truly exciting time indeed.

Cheers.

Mark
 
All this is wonderful news indeed!

Im starting to regret I sold of some of my incan lights...

A SF E1E with better runtime, and a high output bulb from LF would be really great, might have to buy a new E1E...
 
cernobila said:
Sounds very interesting........now, a practical question. What is the pro's and con's compared to the existing Li-ion range of cells from the RCR123 to the 18650 and "C" cells and even the "D" cells.

Pros: Higher current capable
Cons: Lower capacity

In other words, when should I choose the 2x Li-ion 18650's and when should I choose the new 2x 18650's.......and what would be the expected run times for say 6P 2x new RCR123's with EO-9 or P91?

If you come up with a configuration that would have less than 30 minutes of available runtime on LiCo cells, then that would be the time to use LiMn chemistry cells, if runtime is estimated as being longer than 30 minutes on LiCo, then sticking with LiCo is fine, but in some cases, there will be reasons to go with LiMn anyways.

Given that a modern RCR123 LiCo cell has about 600mAH capacity, I would assume that a LiMn RCR123 will have about 400mAH real capacity. In theory, the maximum recommended discharge rate would be somewhere between 3 and 5 amps depending on a number of various factors. Capacity under heavy loads, would be more like 300mAH, Runtime on a P91 would be maybe 6-7 minutes, or on a EO-9, 9 minutes.

OR...Around 3 minutes on a MN21, but this might not be an option, I'm guessing that upper end limit for RCR123 size LiMn will be closer to current demands of the 1794, WA1111, and WA1185. (in the ballpark of 3 amps)...


------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

PhantomPhoton said:
I also wouldn't mind 14500 size if possible. A Quad bored D M@g with some of those babies sounds pretty nice too.

I couldn't agree more. Even simple mag mods with 3 abreast configurations could move into more serious power classes with 14500 cells in this chemistry.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Mark@LF said:
Well, you are only half right there.
Batteries will be a "Great" leap, but with bulbs that are specially designed for them, now that's "Huge" leap.

Sounds great mark....

Wait... so you are going to build the high current lamps I requested you build years ago?? lol....

So have you figured out a way to fit a 11V 5+A (50+W) bulb into a D36?

Or.... how about a 7.2V lamp that runs at 10 amps.... Mounted to an "MN" style base?

Please do share!

Eric
 
Last edited:
Thanks for opening a new thread on this topic, Eric. :)



Well, you are only half right there.
Batteries will be a "Great" leap, but with bulbs that are specially designed for them, now that's "Huge" leap. :twothumbs

We are doing our part in this evolution, as I said before, it will be a truly exciting time indeed.

Cheers.

Mark

This man truly is one of the reasons we never have to worry about LEDs leaving us behind:thumbsup:. I can't wait to see what you guys will cook up next:naughty::eek::drool:.
 
Thanks for opening a new thread on this topic, Eric. :)



Well, you are only half right there.
Batteries will be a "Great" leap, but with bulbs that are specially designed for them, now that's "Huge" leap. :twothumbs

We are doing our part in this evolution, as I said before, it will be a truly exciting time indeed.

Cheers.

Mark
Sweet news!

Bring those new lamps Mark!
 
If I think I'm reading the posts correctly, the technology will allow safer, greater current draw ... but with the reduced capacity, runtime will be terribly short. Just my opinion, but I don't see that as a huge leap.

I've been waiting for the battery technology to catch up so that I could use a 2 x 17500 (or perhaps 2 RCR 123s) in a C3 or M3 with a high output bulb. That would alleviate the need to either bore out the body or use a different body for 18500s.

Will this technology (whether in RCR form or in a 17500 form if that becomes available) allow this? And will runtime improve?
 
Or.... how about a 7.2V lamp that runs at 10 amps.... Mounted to an "MN" style base?
Mark, to add to Eric's suggestion here for bulbs for the SF turbohead, any chance of a range of Ultra-High-Output bulbs with the shorter MN10/11-size pillar, so they could be run in an M3? There could be one that runs off 3x IMR-123-size, another running off 2x IMR-17500-size... drooooll...
 
Top