International Assistance for Katerina

rastaman

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jul 24, 2004
Messages
122
Location
Germany
Sinjz said:
Am I the only one to notice that all these offers of help are in the form of 'experts' and 'teams'? Where's the freak'in CASH? I may be mistaken, but I believe the US probably has enough 'experts' and 'specialist' to handle this right now. I think what's needed is MONEY to actually pay for all this.

Can somebody come up with a list of the CASH donations made by all our friends in the world?

you are soooo wrong.

yesterday 90 specialists from THW (technisches hilfswerk) leaved towards new Orleans. they bring 15 high power pumps with them.

the US is a bit short on this things.

and you never know what happens with cash donatitions, but you'll see what experts have done.
 

rastaman

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Jul 24, 2004
Messages
122
Location
Germany
Silviron said:
Iran also offered oil. 20,000,000 BARRELS. (The only catch is that we have to remove our opposition to them developing nuclear weapons, and that once they get them operational we have to just sit here and be nuked when the time comes).

i hope not every US citizen thinks like you.

if one country offers help, you say this country expects something in change.
if one country does not offer help, you say they dont like us.

in such times, you should bury your hatchet and live and behave like humans.
 

Silviron

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Jun 24, 2001
Messages
2,477
Location
New Mexico, USA
They specifically said that the oil would be given if, and only if we dropped all opposition to their nuclear development plans.

I'll leave it to each individual to figure out exactly what that means rather than begin a discussion that belogs in The Underground.
 
Last edited:

Goran

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
62
Location
Croatia
That's stupid, as if anyone would accept such an offer.

Whatever someone thinks about the "other side" things like this should not be used for power games.

Unfortunately almost everyone does that. Suppose if there is a field of human activity that cannot avoid selfishness, double standards, questionable motives, power struggles and compromises it is the politics.

But than again, I don't think all this offers have some unclear motives behind them.

But than again I'm not sure the same help would be offered if this had happened in for example China or an poor African country either..

Bah, suppose (or hope) it would...

As said earlier we can only ask ourselves what have we done. I didn't (and couldn't) do much unfortunately. If I had the means, or was in a position to do something or at least close enough to do some volunteering or whatever I'd like to think I would. Don't want even to think that much about the "big games", those in authority who have something to say and can make a difference there are responsible for their own actions, what can we do with that? To take international relationships and what comes from that personally has no sense unless we want to be just one more brainwashed sheep to be used by that same political interests...

Not that USA (or anyone) is immune to this and I see no reason for such an attitude like some seen here. If a country with tense relationships with the States had such a situations and the USA offered help they would be now in the same position and with the same filings about the motives. And would probably be right to think that.

So if anyone can do anything personally to help in this or any other situation he should get up from that PC and do something instead of talking about others.
 
Last edited:

Sinjz

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 4, 2003
Messages
1,120
Location
six blocks from ground zero - WTC/NYC
I think some of the people replying need to stop being so narrowly focused. No one is saying ONLY money is acceptable. I also didn't insiuate that the US was being charged for these 'experts' nor did I call any donations 'stupid'. :rolleyes: I was asking how much cash was being offered as it is by far the most useful thing most nations can offer. Large stockpiles of oil is great if your country has it. I hear Kuwait is helping in that regard; Good for them! Pumps also make sense and if Germans are the experts, great. I notice this example was given again and again. In the end, the offers of rescue teams and 'experts' mean little because the US has 'experts' and the rescue is basically over. Once you get pass that initial surge of food and medical needs, you now need cash to pay for everything else. It's not as if the US doesn't have food... Cash buys fuel. Cash pays for food. Cash replenishes medicine. Cash pays for lodging. Cash helps the rebuilding process. I'm not sure how useful a lot of these non-cash offers of help actually are considering the initial disaster is now over. Beside I seem to recall a lot of people bitching about 'how little' the US donated for the Tsunami eventhough the US was doing most of the rescue effort. Why is it the US gets judge on the $, regardless of whatever else they do while others get a pass? I hope I'm wrong, but I heard Japan and most Euro countries only offers $1 million US each.

As for Goran's comment about 'only them who have to fear to be nuked', it's dumb. I guess he wants everybody to have nukes. Politcally motivated? You seem to be the only one. Your last post is dumb too. Stop trying to make simple things complex and confusing to people. The US did not ask for anything before it helped after the Earthquakes in Iran. You're talking out your *** on this topic.
 
Last edited:

chrisse242

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Messages
899
Location
Germany
Sinjz said:
As for Goran's comment about 'only them who have to fear to be nuked', it's dumb. I guess he wants everybody to have nukes. Politcally motivated? You seem to be the only one. Your last post is dumb too. Stop trying to make simple things complex and confusing to people. The US did not ask for anything before it helped after the Earthquakes in Iran. You're talking out your *** on this topic.

My guess would be he wants nobody to have them, and that is by far the most clever point of view one can take in this case, IMHO.
You'd better stop calling other people dumb unless you're getting your facts straight.

Seems like your trying as hard as you can to make every other country look bad compared to the US. Politically motivated?
What a great way of saying "thanks" to all of the international members of cpf. Not only did many of us try to help individually, I also never heard anyone complain about the tax-money being offered to the US. All of us (incl. our gouvernments) knew our help was needed and we helped the best way we could think of.

Good job sinjz! ....................... not!!! :sick2:


Chrisse
 

pedalinbob

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 7, 2002
Messages
2,281
Location
Michigan
Though the info may (or may not) be correct, I find Wikipedia to be a joke.

Thanks for the info, however.

Bob
 

Goran

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
62
Location
Croatia
Sinjz said:
As for Goran's comment about 'only them who have to fear to be nuked', it's dumb. I guess he wants everybody to have nukes.
I would like no one to have nukes, especially not them. Feel much better with the present situation than with the nukes in the hands of individuals of questionable sanity :D
But don't forget that the USA has the biggest arsenal and is the only country that ever used them (with a good reason or not) but is at the same time the one that is the most concerned with others having nuclear weapons and that is frankly a fact that is sooner or later taken out not without a good dose of cynicism in a almost every topic I ever have seen on forums (non in US of course) about that.
I hope Iran will newer develop nuclear weapons though you could have the same concerns with China or N.Korea and they already have them. But the Iranians would think - "they have them but are treating and pushing us not to have them" What would you think if you were Iranian? You would think that the superpowers (or the nuclear powers) just don't want others in this team, especially if not on the same "side".
And having such tense relationships with someone much more powerful you would try to develop something like that feeling that it would be sort of an insurance from possible war treats.
So yes I think some Muslim countries and organizations are a treat, yes I think they should not develop this but also can understand them and you can not expect much sympathy when making so much pressure (even if it is needed) nor will this ever finish the conflicts nor can it go on forever. It can be either a "cool down" or a war. More treats they feel more reasons they have to develop the arsenal.
War is not an option I think with the present situation as Iraq is too unstable to be a secure base for something I suppose much more difficult than the Iraq campaign, the Iran itself would be more compact and united (especially in a war time) and as Muslim countries would not help letting the planes fly over or bases be established in their territory for this and with Iraq not secure that would be too difficult to sustain and even if going into that the pressure on the establishment after some time as costs (in money and human lives) go to high would be too much to handle with any propaganda..
So I don't see at the moment how the nuclear program can be stopped from the outside, the only way is that they decide that it is not needed. That won't happen so.. But who knows what the future holds
You fear the perspective of them developing the nuclear weapons, but they have a potential enemy (that was mentioning the war option more than once lately) that has the most advanced (nuclear)weapons at the moment, so what do you find so dumb in what I said?
Even if Iranians are the devils themselves from their perspective they must feel much more afraid than you do so naturally they are trying to develop their military potential.
End be sure I'm not to fond of Muslims, we even had a suicidal bomb attack where I lived after the arrest of a prominent Muslim leader, the Bosnia is near and it is almost certain there are a lot of (mostly imported) fanatics that used the war to establish them selves in the most western Muslim cuntry that will give them easy aces to Europe.. Besides that arrest we war at war with their Muslim hosts and themselves so they could be a treat and USA are all the opposite. I hope they will not gain strength, just trying to look from their perspective (besides linking Iran to this extremists is at least questionable) and not get in the emotional blinding state of mind. Take the word from someone that has seen his country in a very bloody war some years ago, this will do no good to anyone.

This is sooooooo off topic :ohgeez:

Politcally motivated? You seem to be the only one.
Hmm maybe it is so and I'm not aware of that.Reading the above you must be right. :huh: Though I think it is more that just tend to overanalyze things too much (and talk too much :D )with everything, not just politics, and not taking sides or something. But that's me :shrug:
Anyway I'm just saying that it should not be mixed with the Katarina or tsunami or whatever similar thing and that this should not be used as a diplomatic weapon.


Your last post is dumb too.
Thank you :rolleyes:

Stop trying to make simple things complex and confusing to people.
I'm sorry if it is so complex to you and if that is hurting your feelings, it was not my intention just saying what I think.
I suppose it is much easier to say this are the bad guys, this are the good guys and the life is so simple...
It's just that everyone thinks he is the good guy :D
We are the good ones (of course) and those with us are good ones (of course), but the other ones are beeed (of course). So let's make some black and white lists and divisions so we will have something to fight about until some heads start to roll..And than we make the black lists look blacker and the wight wighter so we can have more heads to sacrifice for the cause...
Eventually when costs get to high and everyone is tired of death emotions calm down.
And than some new generations come, they forget what it is like and you have the history repeated again...
Bah that's like it always was.
"We are alone against the world, we are the victims and heroes, no one understands how good we are and everyone hate us without a reason" a very ego flattering attitude for sure though not a very realistic one but very often to be seen especially in people who are the main characters when there is a fight or a trouble around :D
Now let's find some enemies, let's quarrel upon who likes us and who does not, lets open topics about Katrina that is full of "I know they don't like us" attitude, and don't even pay attention to the posts that are proving it is not so, if we have no enemies we will find them, life is so boring without them, isn't it?
This topic was started with such a presumption and negative attitude that I would not expect on a specialized forum...
And what do you want? All of us (non U.S. members) to get on our knees and based on your presumptions and ignoring the facts start a "mea culpa" self flogging ritual when we become aware how bad we are and how good the States are always helping everyone? Cam on.

The US did not ask for anything before it helped after the Earthquakes in Iran. You're talking out your *** on this topic.
Good for US, bad for Iran.. Even more so if they had no problem accepting US help at the time as you said..
I said that was a stupid thing to do if Iran made such requests.
As well as stupid are some of the comments in the article discussed in the "World view of US response to Katrina" topic.
 
Last edited:

Sinjz

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 4, 2003
Messages
1,120
Location
six blocks from ground zero - WTC/NYC
Thanks Solarflare for clearing that right up. :) Could you please provide a link of some sort so I can see? That's what I've been looking for.

Mark2: not sure what facts you want in order to answer my question about how much cash is being donated. Please calrify and I'll provide what info I can. Please also tell me where you got the idea that donations other than cash was deemed 'stupid'. BTW, what is the Wikipedia Tsunami link for? I'm asking for how much was donated to the US for Katrina relief.

chrisse242: so how does letting Iran get them help in reaching this fantasy scenerio where nobody has them? Also please tell me how asking for a list of how much other countries have donated (or at least pleadged), which is the TOPIC OF THIS THREAD, somehow political or meant to make them look bad? I asked if anybody had a list of cash donations and others jumped on me for reasons they MADE UP. I never said any donation was stupid, nor did I say we were being charged for expert help. I said nothing of the like, but you guys are making things up to argue about.

Goran: Same question that I asked chrisse242. How does letting Iran have nukes help reach this utopian world where nobody has them??? And what does this have to do with Katrina? You now say you don't want Iran to get nukes, that's not what your 'joke' indicated. Yes, it sooo off-topic, I'm no longer going to respond to that topic here. Anyway, It's not confusing for me. I think you guys are missing the point Silviron made so clearly - Iran's offer of aid is pegged to the US dropping it's opposition of the Iranian nuke program. It seem like we are in agreement, except that you're confused and missing that point. You're trying to talk about human behavior. I'm talking about the actual situations. US had no prerequsites tied in, Iran does. Period, very simple.
 

SolarFlare

Enlightened
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
607
Location
UK
Sinjz said:
Thanks Solarflare for clearing that right up. :) Could you please provide a link of some sort so I can see? That's what I've been looking for.

Here you go www.google.com try typing in something like "european aid for New Orleans" or "European aid for Katrina". You obviously haven't looked too hard :p
 

Goran

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
62
Location
Croatia
Sinjz said:
Goran: Same question that I asked chrisse242. How does letting Iran have nukes help reach this utopian world where nobody has them??? And what does this have to do with Katrina? You now say you don't want Iran to get nukes, that's not what your 'joke' indicated.
The "joke" indicated exactly what I said later.
I just think that they have their reasons and fears to do that and have more reason for fear than you do, though it was sort of a joke, did not think a discussion will cam out of that...
They have objective reasons to feel like that now (remember that US is speaking about war, not Iran) while you are afraid of something in a 10year perspective. Newer said that they are some nice guys that would make the world a better place if having more power.

Sinjz said:
And what does this have to do with Katrina?
Nothing, you are right. Sorry for the off topic.

For the rest I agree.

But If you want you will always find some wrong, of all the countries (Cuba, Korea etc included) there is just this one with such a stupid (that is being stupid and whit no diplomatic skills at all besides just unethical)proposal ... Not to bad overall, no? :)
 

chamenos

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 2, 2002
Messages
2,141
Location
Singapore
Sinjz said:
No one is saying ONLY money is acceptable.
you certainly seemed to imply that in your first post:
Sinjz said:
Am I the only one to notice that all these offers of help are in the form of 'experts' and 'teams'? Where's the freak'in CASH?
----------
Sinjz said:
I was asking how much cash was being offered as it is by far the most useful thing most nations can offer."
wrong. supplies, services, and equipment is what is most sorely needed right now. the US's national reserves haven't been depleted due to this disaster. cash isn't the issue right now; logistical issues hampering the flow of supplies, services, and equipment are.
----------
Sinjz said:
In the end, the offers of rescue teams and 'experts' mean little because the US has 'experts' and the rescue is basically over."
and you would know that for a fact, because you're on the ground helping out with the rescue efforts? the offers of rescue teams and "experts" might not mean a lot to you, but they definitely will to the survivors.
----------
Sinjz said:
I'm not sure how useful a lot of these non-cash offers of help actually are considering the initial disaster is now over.
much of your ire seems to stem from pure conjecture and a healthy dose of ignorance regarding facts, despite all the posts here offering evidence to the contrary.
----------
Sinjz said:
Beside I seem to recall a lot of people bitching about 'how little' the US donated for the Tsunami eventhough the US was doing most of the rescue effort.
the media bitched, and a vocal minority bitched. they don't represent the international community at large. incidentally, you seem to be complaining a fair bit about the monetary contributions of the international, conveniently disregarding the other more useful forms of aid that have been offered.
----------
Sinjz said:
You're talking out your *** on this topic.
ignoring the irony in that statement and who it was directed at, you should learn some manners yourself.

i'll end of here; i believe i have an overboiled kettle of water to attend to :rolleyes:
 

Goran

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Aug 26, 2005
Messages
62
Location
Croatia
Sinjz said:
chrisse242: so how does letting Iran get them help in reaching this fantasy scenerio where nobody has them? Also please tell me how asking for a list of how much other countries have donated (or at least pleadged), which is the TOPIC OF THIS THREAD, somehow political or meant to make them look bad? I asked if anybody had a list of cash donations and others jumped on me for reasons they MADE UP. I never said any donation was stupid, nor did I say we were being charged for expert help. I said nothing of the like, but you guys are making things up to argue about.
Uh reading things without looking at the person can heve this effect, I had the impression of a chalenging attitude (and seems I'm not the only one) in the topci so if i was wrong :banghead: :oops:
 

chrisse242

Enlightened
Joined
Dec 12, 2003
Messages
899
Location
Germany
Sinjz said:
chrisse242: so how does letting Iran get them help in reaching this fantasy scenerio where nobody has them? Also please tell me how asking for a list of how much other countries have donated (or at least pleadged), which is the TOPIC OF THIS THREAD, somehow political or meant to make them look bad? I asked if anybody had a list of cash donations and others jumped on me for reasons they MADE UP. I never said any donation was stupid, nor did I say we were being charged for expert help. I said nothing of the like, but you guys are making things up to argue about.

Nobody said it would be a good idea to let Iran have/develop the bomb, neither did anyone imply letting them develop it would help in eliminating all nuclear weapons. Also nobody said the US should accept this "offer".

Your question "where's the fr***ing cash?" certainly didn't sound very gratefull, neither did the phrase " I hope I'm wrong, but I heard Japan and most Euro countries only offers $1 million US each."


The american ambassador asked the german government to send logistics experts, pumps, water, water purifying equipment, generators, tents, blankets and medical supplies. He didn't ask for money.

I really doubt money is what is needed most right now. It's not like you could buy those really big pumps at walmart, and you can't buy thousands of tents, big water purifyers and so on from the shelf.

I can't find the actuall numbers for cash sent by our government right now, and if it's just one million, so be it.

German enterprises donated more than 5 Million Euros, private households even more.

Sorry, there is nothing to change in my post.

Chrisse
 

Sinjz

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 4, 2003
Messages
1,120
Location
six blocks from ground zero - WTC/NYC
I'll keep this reply as short as possible. I think you guys are being overly sensitive. I simply asked where's the cash. I'm not bashing any contribution or whatever else you guys are accusing me of doing. Your 'reading into' my post is all on you. I'll call it what it is, B.S.. It's stuff you guys are making up. It's NOT what I said. I'm not afraid to say what I mean and in this case what I mean is I want to know how much cash has been pledged for Katrina relief. Some of you, like SolarFlare, want to waste bandwidth with nothing post and others want to make up info or throw more accusations. Whatever, I don't care. Someone, I think chamenos, said money isn't an issue right now. I disagree. BILLIONS have already been approved by the US Congress to cover IMMEDIATE relief efforts. That tells me money is important. That being said, no one expects a million from Sri Lanka. However, IF a country as rich and as friendly with the US as Japan only offers $1 million, I believe that is something they SHOULD be ashamed of. You can argue that all you want, I probably won't see it. BTW for those of you who can't read properly, I said IF. I'm not accusing them of that pitiful a pledge. It's what I heard and I'm looking for info that will either confirm or deny that. It's pathetic I've wasted as much time as I already have, arguing about things I never said.

Silveron made a nice and simple reply. He told what he knows and that's it. Can't the rest of you follow his suit?

Now I'm going to watch American Football, a real sport. ;)

GREENDAY!!! :clap:
 

pedalinbob

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Dec 7, 2002
Messages
2,281
Location
Michigan
I am personally very pleased to get any assistance offered by people/countries, regardless of how big or small. Whatever they can give--great! I am grateful to the people of the world helping us.

Apologies for going off-topic: I think the Wiki article about the Tsunami is a bit misleading. There appeared to be a "race" to see who could donate more, but I am unsure who/what motivated this race. Further, the Wiki info uses interesting comparisons (donations vs GDP/GNP, per capita/person, etc) in an attempt to quantify/qualify lesser donations as somehow more charitable...and perhaps make America appear less so.
Even more unusual, is that though it appears to showcase the official government pledges, it also appears to downplay the individual donations and other resources brought to the table.

This is a petty thing in my mind, and appears to be nothing more than a left-handed comment on America's generosity. As an American whose hard work and tax dollars are responsible for trillions in aid around the globe, I am a bit offended by such tactics.

Regardless, the support was incredible, and well-deserved in both situations.

Back to your regularly scheduled programming!

Bob
 

SolarFlare

Enlightened
Joined
Feb 7, 2005
Messages
607
Location
UK
Sinjz said:
Some of you, like SolarFlare, want to waste bandwidth with nothing post

You're quite wrong, again!. My concise posts explain very clearly that:

Firstly, you were wrong.
Secondly, if you want information google it, why should anyone do your legwork?

If you had done in the first place you wouldn't of needed to make such long asinine posts, and waste bandwidth!.:crackup:
 

Kiessling

Flashaholic
Joined
Nov 26, 2002
Messages
16,140
Location
Old World
Guys, please try to stay away from ad hominem attacks and keep discussing the topic and not the poster. Thank you.
bernie
 
Top