LED Flashlight usage update

moldyoldy

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Sep 22, 2006
Messages
1,410
Location
Maybe Wisconsin, maybe near Nürnberg
Sorry for the length of post. Some of the thoughts need to stay together to remain in context. The main point is that these comments are not about what I would like in an LED flashlight. Nevertheless, some of the comments are pertinent to my experiences and preferences. I have inadvertently turned into a purveyor of flashlights for a couple dozen people ranging from school teachers to maintenance men to college students with some engineers tossed in for completeness. This is absolutely not flashaholic territory! Prime requirements are bright and small (pocketable) and simple to operate.

Simple operation: on or off. Most of the usage is high (turbo) or low and very little in-between. Ramping levels mean nothing. The preferred level at turn-on is max output. Some low level is an alternate for run-time enhancement. The Fenix method of two modes, one of which could be turbo at turn-on, is usable. Twisty operation is simpler, a clicky is possible, but some people do not have the strength in a single finger/thumb to push the clicky as far as it needs to go. Fenix seems to have regressed in how far their clicky switches have to be pushed to be "on" – too deep of a push. The L1T/L2T-V2.0 are simple, but the output is too low.

Number of cells: Single cell is the winner by far. The L2D-xx or D20 are simply too long. The TK-xx is almost too fat. The P3D-XX is acceptable, sort of. Any attempt to group cells parallel to each other would result in a fat light – no-go.

Brightness & color: white and bright. 120 lumens to 180+ lumens for the high level. The P1D-Q5 wins the popularity contest, although they use the first level that turns on, rarely do they switch levels. The P3D-Q5 close behind for the really impressive output. The primary problem is the CR123 cells. The L1D-Q5 is Ok, but on the low side for intensity even on turbo. There is a significant difficulty in testing for brightness due to varying spot/spill conditions as well as the battery condition. I am surprised at the strong effect of state of charge and age of the AA cells on intensity. The terminal voltage varies noticeably under load, which directly affects the brightness especially on single AA lights.

Battery type: the AA or AAA cells are by far the most requested, until the people discover the relative intensity increase because of the CR123 cell. Even then they balk. CR123 cells are not routinely available or too expensive when the battery is discharged. AA cells are available almost anywhere. It makes no difference that the school or maintenance office has spare CR123 cells available.

Beam pattern: for those working inside of a building – a beam with an OK spot, but lots of spill is wanted. For those working outside of a building – lots of spot (throw), but some spill is desired. The L1D-Q5 has a rather diffuse spot and is liked for inside work. The LD10 has a tight spot and will be noticeably brighter than the L1D-Q5 at distances beyond 25 meters. The D20 actually has a small tight spot, surrounded by a larger spot, then with spill. Even the D10 and D10-GDP are remarkable in beam pattern differences. It is difficult even for me to pick one - So I have both…. :)

Switch action: twist vs click vs piston. I have had many click switches fail on me, including Maglites. So far I have not had any Fenix click switches fail…yet. I have had the clicky switch pill rotate inside the tube and therefore fail to switch. A needle-nose pliers rotates it back. Twist switching is the simplest, but does require periodic cleaning and lubrication to maintain ease of rotation. The preferred switch is the twist. The piston switching method is the most elegant in design, but flaky in use. The double-click speed is set too fast in the NiteCore examples that I have (D10/D10GDP/D20). Most people, including myself, observe rather a lot of failed attempts to change from one mode to the other. There is also the ramping problem which evidently was solved in the D20. A surprising problem is the battery inside the piston. With a single-cell AA, the problem is not noticed. However with a two AA cells, the piston push can be quite stiff and not springing back as it should. I first noticed the stiffness issue when I tried out the D20 with 4 different battery brands. The2 Maha Imedion cells functioned as I have come to expect from my D10 units. The2 Maha Powerex cells were miserable – almost nothing worked correctly. Upon closer examination, I realized that the cells were slightly fatter, the casing was more abraded and resisted motion, and the base contact had a slight convex shape resulting in the cells kind of jamming themselves against the piston in the middle. The end result was much more friction between the batteries and the piston side-wall. Rubbing the AA cells with some very light electronic lube oil restored the correct operation.

What do I use? I kept one P3D-Q5 from all the 2-cell CR123 lights. I admittedly probably have a P3D-Q5 that is above average in intensity – better than any TK-xx lights that have passed thru my hands. I prefer single cell lights for size, safety, and consistency of use. That also means that if a cell discharges prematurely, I do not have to guess which one. For a variety of reasons, I am also slowly migrating away from CR123 cells. I just wish the AA lights had greater intensity! Most of what I have now are single cell AA lights with the highest intensity available. The two AA lights are too loooong! Last wish - the L0D-xx needs to reach 100 lumens!
 
...comments are pertinent to my experiences and preferences. I have inadvertently turned into a purveyor of flashlights

I kept one P3D-Q5 from all the 2-cell CR123 lights. I admittedly probably have a P3D-Q5 that is above average in intensity – better than any TK-xx lights that have passed thru my hands.

Moldyoldy,

Your experiences enrich the CPF community. I do not have a P3D-Q5, but I do share your reasoning of settling down with it. In fact, I too am hoping one day there would be a 1-cell (prefer AA too) light with a blazing 150+ lumens on high and perhaps 15 lumens on low. In addition, it ought to be lightweight and no bigger than, say, an EX10. I have an D10 and like its interface, but it is on the heavier side to my liking.

What are your thoughts on batteries? My ideal light would take AA alkaline, NiMH, and even 14500 Li-ions all the same without sacrificing the lows.

Until then...

With Aloha,

Clarence
 
I tend to agree with everything that you've stated. I'm also a fan of big fan of the P3D and have 3 different versions of it. I have two versions of P1D also and agree that it's fantastic. Probably the only light that I use more often are the LOD's and wanted to mention that I've been using 10440's since the first version of the light was released. I'm not sure if you've considered the 10440 but I love that little battery in the LOD.

Over the last year or two I've slowly been coming around to embracing the single cell formula. Before that I was a die hard two and three cell primary type of guy who loved the E2, L2, L4, 6P, M2, and M3. I think the main reason for my change is because the LED's have become so efficient that I don't feel that the energy in two cells is necessary for more of my edc needs. A also feel that I'm enjoying the best of both worlds because of single cells and li-ion. I believe that the 14500 is probably the next level that you're looking for in performance and will provide the extra intensity that you're missing. Since 3V Alkalines & NiMHs will never be available, I don't see what option you would have, not that I consider li-ion to have any significant disadvantage.

In short, I couldn't be more pleased with the LOD and 10440s or lights like the NDI with 14500 and I've never had a single failure of any type. It's close to flashlight bliss for me. :)
 
<snip>I'm not sure if you've considered the 10440 but I love that little battery in the LOD.

<snip> I believe that the 14500 is probably the next level that you're looking for in performance and will provide the extra intensity that you're missing. Since 3V Alkalines & NiMHs will never be available, I don't see what option you would have, not that I consider li-ion to have any significant disadvantage.

In short, I couldn't be more pleased with the LOD and 10440s or lights like the NDI with 14500 and I've never had a single failure of any type. It's close to flashlight bliss for me. :)

Yes, I have used the Li-Ion in AAA and AA formats, and that has been picked up by a couple users, a maintenance man with an L1D-Q5 and another dad who wanted all he could get out of an L0D-xx format. both of them are careful in not letting the lights get too hot. however, that system with special batteries and charger is borderline for non-flashaholics, although admittedly that setup itself probably qualifies them as flashaholics!

I did have one failure with an L0D-CE when it was digesting an AAA Li-Ion. no evidence of what happened, except it refused to turn on one day with any battery type. I tossed it. Now any L0D-Q4 that I hand out comes with AAA Lithium cells from Eveready. They last a long time, and no special handling is required. I myself still use AAA NiMH cells in my L0D-Q4 units. maybe once in a while I drop in a Li-Ion cell just to impress someone as to what is possible from an AAA size light.
 
Top