Sorry about that..........TWO WEEKS after they shipped here is a "hint" about a NEW AND IMPROVED version. I'm just sure that they'll fix the little quirks so that we'll all want to buy the new one. 4-7's, I love my D10 and you've always given me great service but it's just wrong to play us like that man.
Sorry about that...
I wouldn't call it "new and imPROVED." Because this LED has yet to prove itself.
It won't be replacing any existing models.
Think of it this way instead - it's a trial on this new LED to see if it can perform
as claimed according to the LED manufacturer's spec. It's will be a derivation of
a current model - not a replacement. If it doesn't fit the bill... *poof* it'll be
gone
Think of it this way instead - it's a trial on this new LED to see if it can perform
as claimed according to the LED manufacturer's spec. It's will be a derivation of
a current model - not a replacement. If it doesn't fit the bill... *poof* it'll be
gone
Not true. I have the assembler code in front of me....Liteflux author said probably because Nitecore engineers wrote programs in C, while he used assembler lanuage for Liteflux...
I agree. We're just looking to improve the product and part of the processOr you could think of it as the hype preceding v2.0 tho right? I've read a number of posts saying that people didn't like the hype preceding the launch of the SPD lights. I actually disagree, advertising the launch of a product is just a part of the process and I have no problem with that. What I don't like (and I DO NOT put the SPD's in this catagory) is hyping a product that is not quite ready, selling lights with bugs, fixing the bugs and then selling these same beta testers/consumers the fixed version. IMO, it is also wrong to come out with a new model every month or two with tiny tweaks that everyone will just HAVE to have.
Now look at what yous guys did. You went and ran him off!! :laughing:And again like we emphasized in the launch, simplicity is the key word
Ok, I will shutup now I won't say anything until new products are ready
to go.
Not true. I have the assembler code in front of me.
Lemme guess... The continuous ramping was implemented as a lookup table that ate all the memory space
I just got my EX10. Everything is great other than the button (piston) sticks. I took it apart, cleaned all the goo out of it and lubed with lighter oil. However, it is hard to do a quick double click because the button wants to stick in and slowly come back out. I figured out that it is the O ring in the tail end that is the culprit. I took that O-ring out and tried it like that for a minute and the light works great. I don't know if I want to use it with out the o ring in the tail, so I put it back and am just living with the stiff button. Other than that, the light is a great piece for the money I spent on it. I might try to find a slightly smaller o ring. :shakehead
After reading a lot about the new lights here I bought the EX10. The Quality of the light really surprised me, I love it! I think that the dimming is also great, couldn't ask for more out of a single cr123 light.
Sending the EX10 back for a refund. Not only am I having problems with the o ring, now the light acts like momentary on, even though the head is fully screwed down. It is only 60 bucks, but I don't think I should have to deal with that. Luckily, the Fenix-Store has good customer service. I ordered the D10, I will see how that treats me. I am hopeful, the potential is certainly there. I really like the concept of the UI, this particular unit is just not so great so far...
I don't think anything's wrong with his D10, just seemed like he's worried it might activate accidentally.
I doubt his ND10 will turn on accidentally, unless he's very vigorously shaking his pocket with the ND10 and other hard objects in it.
I rate the chances of accidental activation of the ND10 around .000003%. :naughty: :twothumbs