ABTOMAT said:
I'd say that's closer to "near mint minus" as far as these things go. Doesn't look like it's been used to pound railroad spikes.
Ooh, a D-ring tailcap. Those are hard to find.
Yesiree, a D-Ring Tail
You know your Kel-Lites!
As far as pounding RR spikes, no... but see those little pockmarks along the body? Believe it or not I did throw it down deliberately and repeatedly on a gravel driveway about 20 years ago just to see how tough it was and to give it a "battle worn" look. Of course, it kept on ticking. Also (and Mac will verify this) it has seen it's share of leaky alkalines over the years... I had to pound one set out with a broomstick and a sledgehammer. These have eaten off the ano inside and left a cratered interior. Of course, it kept on ticking (after a good clean-out out with a wire brush and some bore cleaner).
Beat up... well technically yes (on purpose), so how about we give it an "Excellent+" instead of "Near-Mint-Minus"?
Just got the light back today... This particular one and I go waaaay back, and have more stories to tell. A Kel-Lite is a hard thing to inadvertently toss away or leave behind. You only have to pick one up to know that. I like to think it has 'turned over a new leaf', the Duracoat finish is one thing - and a pretty one at that - but the truly amazing part is the HID module, and the way Mac has integrated it into this decades old design so seamlessly, so perfectly. This above all is the part that I think Don Keller would get a kick out of. Not only is the thing every bit as effective for "defensive" use - stated to be the
primary purpose of the Kel-Lite at the time - but now the thing is
BRIGHT!
As Johnny come lately Dr. Matthews of SF is fond of saying, "brighter than a 4-D Cell duty light". Just a little. As in 300 lumens vs. 20 lumens. Thanks to Mac's expert fitting of the ballast and bulb module into the body (deserving of another photoshoot), the focus is dead-on with the head screwed down tight - as it needs to be for "non-lighting" use - and it throws like like you wouldn't believe.
HID efficiency being what it is, I'd say runtime has been increased by 400% as well. I'm doing a runtime test as I type this, and it's going on 45 minutes with no sign of letting up.
Edit: The HID cut off clean and quick after 1h10m of runtime with AW's "new" 17670's.
"
My liiiiiitle friend" has got some big brothers knocking about, including a couple of 7-cell behemoths that I'm inclined to let alone until the next quantum leap in technology... I mean, how do you top
this? In the meantime, this old buddy seems pretty happy being back on the top shelf, and that makes me happy as well.
Cheers,