garence
Newly Enlightened
I've been seeing this, time and time again. Here's a really great light, all the things a person seems to want except... it's a damned reverse clicky!
I'm guessing a reverse clicky is the choice for reducing the chance of accidental function that could drain the battery when made with a forward clicky (the light is pressed up against something that actuates it).
And of course, forward clicky is for tactical--simple on/off without clicking and easy manual strobe/signaling.
So... how hard would it be to design a switch that can work either way? Perhaps some kind of screw-in module that can be turned 180 degrees, with one orientation for forward and the 180 degree orientation for reverse. Would it be too costly to do this? Has indeed any company done it yet?:thinking:
I'm guessing a reverse clicky is the choice for reducing the chance of accidental function that could drain the battery when made with a forward clicky (the light is pressed up against something that actuates it).
And of course, forward clicky is for tactical--simple on/off without clicking and easy manual strobe/signaling.
So... how hard would it be to design a switch that can work either way? Perhaps some kind of screw-in module that can be turned 180 degrees, with one orientation for forward and the 180 degree orientation for reverse. Would it be too costly to do this? Has indeed any company done it yet?:thinking: