S&W revolver.@340pd : BTW, that '340' isn't an engine displacement is it?
S&W revolver.@340pd : BTW, that '340' isn't an engine displacement is it?
Thanx. The 340 was a great engine, but that looks like a very nice J-frame. I don't happen to have any wheelguns currently, but that appears to be a very nice carry gun indeed. Cheers!S&W revolver.
Good news! SureFire, and Watson both make 3.0v. rechargeable CR123 batteries. Can confirm that the Watsons work. Usually two such cells sold with a charger bundled together. Though you can buy the cells separately too. Definitely expect some reduced runtime with the Watsons. But no need for a beloved EDC light to be tucked away in a drawer.My Leatherman Serac S3 still works just fine. It's so old, I can't even remember exactly when I bought it. Early 2000s? My Inova X1 that I bought in 2014 or 2015 still works just fine, as well. The Serac S3 is retired as my EDC light, mainly because CR123As are too expensive for me...
I think, for me, the concern is user serviceability specifically with expensive things. This idea popped in my head when considering buying some more stuff from Malkoff, or trying out an HDS rotary - the latter which is $400+.User serviceability is not something I think about, at all, mainly because I can only recall two lights that ever failed on me in the past 20+ years. The first was a first generation CMG Infinity Task Light that developed circuitry problems (the other one I own still works fine, company was later bought out by Gerber/Fiskars), and the second was a first generation Mini Mag-Lite LED 2xAA whose switch failed (only Mag-Lite I've ever had fail since the 1980s). In neither case did I care enough to see about any warranty service.
My Leatherman Serac S3 still works just fine. It's so old, I can't even remember exactly when I bought it. Early 2000s? My Inova X1 that I bought in 2014 or 2015 still works just fine, as well. The Serac S3 is retired as my EDC light, mainly because CR123As are too expensive for me, and the X1 (which replaced the Serac S3) is no longer my EDC light, but it still sits on my kitchen table for utility use around the house.
If I had had more light failures in my life, I might think more about serviceability, but it's not been enough of an issue for me to worry about.
That got me thinking about how much I see the end user serviceability as a fair portion of what I consider long-term reliability of a light, and I'm curious to hear other peoples' views on that.
It reminds me of something I heard years ago; "As complexity increases, reliability decreases."It's one of the factors for me, yes.
But with so much "tech" (computers) embedded in so many things, these days, fewer and few products are ending up user-servicable.
Like many, here, I too like the Malkoff drop-in modules. I can use them with a few different head/body/tail setups, and do the basic maintenance on the seals myself. I can move the module to another light, and I can drop in a different module if I sell that piece and "upgrade." Not a lot of change, but then these things don't require much at all. Like the ditty for the ol' Timex watches, they keep a lickin' and keep on tickin'.
Wish cars were like that. But most cars have so many features and whiz-bang gizmos, that people mostly have come to expect it. I seriously doubt many of the "top" makers are going to be successful at the simpler bare-bones offerings.
100%. You mean like my '85 1/2' CRX-Si, which I only very recently sold? Near 40 years of pure bliss;-)I'd love to have a simple car like my old CRX; manual steering, manual transmission, roll-down windows.
That's actually one of the worst parts. I still have the shop manual from my CRX. The best were the Bentley manuals for Volkswagens (they had all the technical steps, plus very helpful step-by-step instructions, so you didn't have to bounce around in chapters). I could do everything. Time consuming, but simple jobs like retorquing valves with feeler gauges was a nice afternoon project. Now? It's expensive, if I can even find a shop that will agree to it (they're usually so booked up, they turn down non-essential work)...and then, half the time, I swear I do better work myself...100%. You mean like my '85 1/2' CRX-Si, which I only very recently sold? Near 40 years of pure bliss;-)
Ever try to get one of those wonderful hard copy service manuals of old for a newer Honda? You can't. They don't even sell them anymore. It now requires an expensive subscription to access the info on line:-( At least I still have a 30 year old Honda (with a fine, if seldom used service manual) to drive (I do have a newer one, but you couldn't pay me to work on it.)
Interestingly, with the cars, that's part of the reason that repairs have become so costly; one thing breaks, and it's connected to 10 other systems, and a once simple repair requires a lot more work. I used to work on my own cars exclusively, but these days, relatively simple tasks can require things like removing the entire engine, having to reprogram computers, etc.
And this, right there, is why I keep coming back to the Surefire P60/Malkoff ecosystem. You can get ANYTHING you need, so lights can just run forever.As you point out, with all that crap comes complexity for diagnosing and fixing failures, lack of easy access to frequently-maintained components, complexity of repairs.
I have a top dollar cap on Chyna made flashlights of $28 US. The "warranty" on these lights is absolutely garbage. If and when a warranty claim is honored it's with the caveat you have to ship the light back at your expense. $28 shipping is the cheapest I've found via USPS. Screw that. That being said, I have been made whole by Wurkkos for defective units (twice) without having to return the defective unit. Sent them a video, and received a replacement in 10 days. Some Chyna companies are good about this. I have other purchases that were treated the same. YMMV.I really like to buy well made, durable "buy once, cry once" items, and flashlights are no exception. I really, really like Malkoff lights because they're extremely well made, very durable, AND are easy enough to service if something breaks. When I put in an order, it's maybe $10-15 to toss in a spare set of o-rings, lens, and/or switch.
I've been toying with the idea of picking up an HDS rotary, as the quality, durability, and UI are very, very appealing, too. But, I just can't seem to pull the trigger on a rotary knowing if I have to replace the rubber boot on a tailcap, I either need to mail it back to HDS and/or possibly void the warranty attempting to DIY the job (I wouldn't say I'm incompetent with tinkering, but I'm definitely risk averse to voiding the warranty on an expensive thing).
That got me thinking about how much I see the end user serviceability as a fair portion of what I consider long-term reliability of a light, and I'm curious to hear other peoples' views on that. I sometimes see other folks mention such concerns, but then plenty of people seem content with the idea of warranty work for their light. Maybe part of this is all just the overall cost of the HDS, and any additional costs make the bullet that much harder to bite?
For most of my Chinese lights, I buy them without ever thinking about this, because they're cheap enough, and I assume the warranty is mostly fake (which is why I tend to buy the more expensive Chinese lights like Weltool or Armytek from retailers with great customer service). Thinking about spending a couple of hundred bucks on a light kind of changed the equation in my head.
Of course, maybe that means I should just get a clicky HDS, haha. I'm half hoping the next generation of rotary will offer a single AA and a better boot replacement solution, but that might be just wishful thinking.
But anyway, I'm bored and I don't like summer heat, so what kind of thoughts do people have?
I can only do a manual, haha.In terms of cars, if you want as simple as it gets in 2024....
Mitsubishi Mirage hatchback, lowest trim or the G4 variation (sedan) in the lowest trim. But get them while you can, the masses don't want simplistic reliability. And Mitsubishi is discontinuing the Mirage for 2025. End of an Era.
That is essentially how I operate.I have a top dollar cap on Chyna made flashlights of $28 US. The "warranty" on these lights is absolutely garbage. If and when a warranty claim is honored it's with the caveat you have to ship the light back at your expense. $28 shipping is the cheapest I've found via USPS. Screw that. That being said, I have been made whole by Wurkkos for defective units (twice) without having to return the defective unit. Sent them a video, and received a replacement in 10 days. Some Chyna companies are good about this. I have other purchases that were treated the same. YMMV.
Good news! You can get a manual instead of a CVT on both the Mirage hatch-back and the sedan. Good for tall drivers. (Since the CVT is a garbage JATCO one, the manual increases the reliability of the Mirage, substantially.)I can only do a manual, haha.
I've been kidding, but now it's become serious...that it's just an inevitability that I'm going to end up in a Miata (MX-5). I'm tall...and I hate convertibles...but...manual, haha.
I actually just picked up that Seraph today, with a momentary tailcapLumens Factory still has some nice, well made options that keep the P60 (and D26) options available. They don't cost like SureFire prices these days as well. And for the purist, there are bulb modules available.
The new modular Seraph is on my radar screen.
Oh, that's cool, then. I LOVE a good hatchback. Maybe when my current econo-beater dies, I'll have to keep an eye open for a mirage.Good news! You can get a manual instead of a CVT on both the Mirage hatch-back and the sedan. Good for tall drivers. (Since the CVT is a garbage JATCO one, the manual increases the reliability of the Mirage, substantially.)
Hopefully we can look forward to some commentary on that, as / when appropriate(?). I'm sure it would be received with some interest in these partsI actually just picked up that Seraph today, with a momentary tailcap