Curious... what is the metal ring on an XR-E for? Are there any benefits to removing it? How can you remove it?
I have read of it being removed, in the large thread about the task force 2c cree from lowes. Are these users doing irreparable damage? The ring appears to me to be used to focus the led outward, if so, removing it should gain in flood characteristics (adjusting, of course for the reflector). Am I assuming right?
Not even worth trying then... Thanks all.
Sorry but it is not possible to remove just the ring and not the dome. What you want is the new XP-E or XP-C.Isn't the dome also to protect the phosphor? I just want the ring removed, so it will act more like an SSC.
The increase in throw is from a combination of more light to the sides and the fact that the apparent die size decreases allowing for better collimation. By my estimation the decrease in die size is responsible for the bulk of the increase in throw and not the more Lambertian output caused by the lack of the "Cree ring" blocking light to the side .i removed the dome of a P4 for a magmod. and the results are better than with domw, because the reflector seems to catch more light, because the opening angle of the emitter goes up.
the result are a little less lumens but a far better throw
Isn't the dome also to protect the phosphor? I just want the ring removed, so it will act more like an SSC.
I don't know how more quickly the phosphor will degrade without the gel.
The phosphor is not mixed with silicone on Crees.As far as I know the layer phosphor is mixed in with silicon and the silicon above it is just so less light is lost between the phosphor silicon mix and the lens.
Btw, how did you manage to remove the silicon without damaging the bond wires?
The phosphor is not mixed with silicone on Crees.
As far as I know the layer phosphor is mixed in with silicon and the silicon above it is just so less light is lost between the phosphor silicon mix and the lens.
Btw, how did you manage to remove the silicon without damaging the bond wires?