Re: SkyRC — IFA 2014 / CES 2016 — MC3000 charger-analyzer
Qualitatively it is the same for all Li-ion chemistries. The rapid increase in IR when the cell is near empty is (partly) what causes the more rapid decrease in voltage after the "knee" of the discharge curve. If this did not occur then the curve would have much less of a knee.
Beware that there is a lot of false and misleading info about Li-ion tech on the net, including about internal resistance. For example, a large part of
BatteryBro's Myth #5 on internal resistance is either false or misleading.
I was aware that the higher the IR the more pronounced the V drop under load.
I said it is my oppinion that it doesnt affect IMR as much as standar li-ion , because in tests i made the IMR have lower v drop and knee exibits at a lower voltages compared to standard li-ion.At least with cells i own.
Sanyo UR18500F - knee at 3.3V
Panasonic NCR18500 - knee at around 3V
LG INR18650-HG2 - Knee exibits at around 2.8v.
Samsung INR18659-30Q - max i discharged it is 3v and no pronounced knee up to that voltage, i suppose it would have the same results as the LG as tests on these 2 batteries show they have almost identical performance.
So by this i conclude that measuring IR on the lg at 2.8v would give me results with the same precision as measuring the sanyo at 3.3v or the panasonic at 3v. Correct me if im wrong.
So why shouldnt we have the option of getting the IR without an additional step , right?
![Smile :) :)]()
.
I really think it wouldnt bother anyone, but rather make things easier for part of us to have the option to set the min voltage for IR measurement as desired.
And ill mention again that 0.15A charge rate if battery is below 3.2V , thats even more annoying and time consuming.
Edit:
Mixed IMR with INR, but you catch my drift