I don't know who to put my trust in. The last real hub-bub about the Swine flu that I recall was in the 70s and there were more fatalities among those who listened to the medical advice and got the Swine flu shot than those who didn't and just took their chances with the flu. The fact that medical science has come so far did little to comfort the survivors of those who followed the official advice and died.
When it comes to medicine I'll have to just have a look at what's out there and make my own decisions. I'm 58 and I made it through the last Swine flu event..I'm cautiously optimistic about this one...
Moot point this time around since there is no vaccine for this swine flu.
I couldn't disagree more. I apologize for not being clearer about what I was trying to say. Let me try again.
While it's true that there is no Swine flu shot this time around, there is far more to the equation than that. Let's start by looking at the dynamics involved in bringing the bad Swine flu shot to the public over thirty years ago. It illustrates nicely why individuals today must think very carefully about decisions made for the country's well being. No conspiracy theories, just an examination of the way important decisions have been made and will continue to be made for the forseeable future.
In addition to the labs that came up with the flu shot that killed people, there were also those in the industry that reviewed the work of those who who made the flu shot. After
everyone involved in the development and production of the flu shot that killed more people than the flue
signed off on it it was then time for the politicians to make their mistakes. Gerald Ford signed off on it and recommended that all Americans have the shot.
The key here
is not the shot. The thing to take away from this is that all of the decisions were made by
humans and are therefore subject to a high degree of folly. That's just the way humans are. Some of the
bad decisions were made by
scientists; some were made by
bureaucrats who are key in nearly all endeavors (including medicine.) Then to cap it off a
politician makes the last bad decision (
next to the last, actually. No one was
forced to take the shot.)
What makes it interesting is that there is so much about these decisions that may have had nothing to do with medicine. In a potential pandemic situation where the health of hundreds of millions or even billions of people hang in the balance, life and death decisions will be made by politicians, economists and even the military. These decision makers have a few things in common, aside from the fact that they are
not a part of the medical culture. They are bureaucrats and as such have at least some of the same concerns as all bureaucrats do: will this decision grow or shrink their bureaucracies and their budgets, as well as more generalized questions that range from subjects like their careers to their daughters college education. Some have accused Ford of basing his decision on his plans for the upcoming election. These are all
human issues not
medical issues. Because so much of ALL big medical policy issues are resolved by mere humans, often with their own self interest at heart, I am suspect of all of them and will always try to read between the lines and sus out the truth before I decide on a course of action for myself and my loved ones.
I'm sorry I wasn't clearer, chmsam.
NOTE: I'm not trying to introduce partisan politics into this discussion. Far from it. I'm asserting that all pols, regardless of stripe, have and will behave the same way. I have made no comment on the administration's handling of this subject. I'm only pointing out that aside from other non-medical disciplines, politics will also
always be involved in any issues with the potential to affect this many people.
That's what politics is for. I'm not taking sides one way or the other on any political issue concerning this subject.