Surface Tension
Newly Enlightened
I'm trying to design an underwater light with a separate light head and battery canister.
I've read the adventures of DM51 with his "moderator" and I'm trying to avoid a similar situation.
After reading about his experience, I'm of the opinion that the main problem wasn't the dissimilar metals per se, but rather that the electrical circuit was using the metal flashlight body as a conductor to ground (this might have been concluded in his thread, I apologize if it was but I skimmed over some of it).
The drop in emitter I bought grounds to the metal piece it is mounted in, and if this was mounted in a metal light head body, the whole body becomes part of the circuit, resulting in all kind of galvanic corrosion and/or deposition. This happens on a micro scale due to slight variations in metal content and is what leads to pitting corrosion in pipes and such (so it is dissimilar metals in this sense). This is not a problem in flashlights not submerged, but in underwater flashlights.
So, my question is, do you agree? and
Should I somehow isolate the light head body from the circuit?
This could be accomplished by using a plastic body, but I loose a lot of the cooling effect of the metal body.
I do not believe putting some kind of coating on the body would be effective as any slight chip would result in contact and corrosion.
I am leaning toward a design that has a plate that the emitters are mounted in to act as a heat sink. The plate would then be mounted in the metal light housing but electrically isolated from it. The down side would be there would be no direct metal thermal path for the heat to the light head body. I'm not sure if they make a material that is a good thermal conductor and poor electrical conductor.
So, waddya think?
Please hurry, because I have a buddy at a machine shop ready to make me whatever I send him for a design! :thumbsup:
I've read the adventures of DM51 with his "moderator" and I'm trying to avoid a similar situation.
After reading about his experience, I'm of the opinion that the main problem wasn't the dissimilar metals per se, but rather that the electrical circuit was using the metal flashlight body as a conductor to ground (this might have been concluded in his thread, I apologize if it was but I skimmed over some of it).
The drop in emitter I bought grounds to the metal piece it is mounted in, and if this was mounted in a metal light head body, the whole body becomes part of the circuit, resulting in all kind of galvanic corrosion and/or deposition. This happens on a micro scale due to slight variations in metal content and is what leads to pitting corrosion in pipes and such (so it is dissimilar metals in this sense). This is not a problem in flashlights not submerged, but in underwater flashlights.
So, my question is, do you agree? and
Should I somehow isolate the light head body from the circuit?
This could be accomplished by using a plastic body, but I loose a lot of the cooling effect of the metal body.
I do not believe putting some kind of coating on the body would be effective as any slight chip would result in contact and corrosion.
I am leaning toward a design that has a plate that the emitters are mounted in to act as a heat sink. The plate would then be mounted in the metal light housing but electrically isolated from it. The down side would be there would be no direct metal thermal path for the heat to the light head body. I'm not sure if they make a material that is a good thermal conductor and poor electrical conductor.
So, waddya think?
Please hurry, because I have a buddy at a machine shop ready to make me whatever I send him for a design! :thumbsup: