How would you compare the Eagletac to the TK35 overall?
I'm really not sure how. But I will try. The ET has around 10K of more lux than TK35, but from what I have seen, the TK35 is
noticably brighter. Bigger hotspot too. But it reaches out there by brute lumen force. I don't have it, but IRC, ET has a 350 or so meter throw, and TK35 has 333 meter throw. Not much farther if you ask me. The TK35 is also cheaper, and much smaller
. But the Eagletac has more accesories. But the only accessories I see me using is the diffuser and the holster/lanyard. The ET also does not support Flat-tops, which is why i did not buy it. all of my 6 salvage laptop 18650 are flat-tops. If you want throw, get the TK41 ($120) when it comes out, it has 55,000 cd, and a slightly higher lux rating. It uses 8 aa batteries. I know there are multiple 18650 powered lights coming out in the near future, but I don't want to go everywhere with a silent pipe bomb. Plus, I'm survival oriented most of the time, and somehow, my guts tell me there won't be 18650 or readily available cr123 in a situation. And the long runtimes of the tk41 will lessen the need for batteries. Only downside is it is bigger and uses 8 battteries a round. So overall, I would choose the TK35 over ET, even if ET supported flat tops. ET is pretty good, but nowadays, I am trying to get good lumen for the money. ET is no good deal for me as long as the TK35 is out.But then again, im not buying either one. Oh yeah, can anyone post link to the lumanpower force thingy with the 78K of lux? Can't find it anywhere.