asdalton
Flashlight Enthusiast
I got a Streamlight 4AA this week, and I like it a lot. However, I know that alkaline batteries have a lousy discharge curve, and that the flashlight will get noticeably dimmer as the batteries are consumed. Has anyone here used this light successfully with rechargeables? I've seen conflicting stories in the older posts.
The old version of the SL 4AA relied heavily on the internal resistance of the alkaline batteries to restrict the current, and NiMH batteries would fry the LEDs despite their nominally lower voltage. The new version has 22 ohm resistors instead of 12 ohm, and so the internal resistance of the batteries will matter less. But how much less?
I did some rough calculations based on the following formula for the current though one LED:
I [mA] = (1/7)*1000*(4*Vb - Vf)/(Rl/7 + 4*Ri)
Vb = voltage of one battery
Vf = forward voltage across LEDs
Rl = resistance of each LED resistor [ohms]
Ri = internal resistance of each AA battery [ohms]
I used data from the Eveready website to obtain the following parameters:
Energizer AA alkaline:
Vf = 1.5 V, Ri = 0.156 ohm (initial)
Energizer AA NiMH:
Vf = 1.4 V, Ri = 0.030 ohm (initial)
If Rl = 12 ohm and Vf = 3.4 V, I obtain the following:
With alkalines: I = 159 mA (ouch!)
With NiMH: I = 171 mA (ouch!!!)
If Rl = 22 ohms and Vf is the same,
With alkalines: I = 98 mA
With NiMH: I = 96 mA
All of these values seem too high, since I recall seeing an older post saying that the old design (with alkalines) drew 120 mA per LED, while the new design draws 90 mA per LED. Maybe I need to use a higher Vf or higher Ri. However, the qualitative trend is that the new design for the Streamlight 4AA should be much more tolerant of NiMH batteries. The NiMH batteries might even drive *less* current.
What does everyone else think?
The old version of the SL 4AA relied heavily on the internal resistance of the alkaline batteries to restrict the current, and NiMH batteries would fry the LEDs despite their nominally lower voltage. The new version has 22 ohm resistors instead of 12 ohm, and so the internal resistance of the batteries will matter less. But how much less?
I did some rough calculations based on the following formula for the current though one LED:
I [mA] = (1/7)*1000*(4*Vb - Vf)/(Rl/7 + 4*Ri)
Vb = voltage of one battery
Vf = forward voltage across LEDs
Rl = resistance of each LED resistor [ohms]
Ri = internal resistance of each AA battery [ohms]
I used data from the Eveready website to obtain the following parameters:
Energizer AA alkaline:
Vf = 1.5 V, Ri = 0.156 ohm (initial)
Energizer AA NiMH:
Vf = 1.4 V, Ri = 0.030 ohm (initial)
If Rl = 12 ohm and Vf = 3.4 V, I obtain the following:
With alkalines: I = 159 mA (ouch!)
With NiMH: I = 171 mA (ouch!!!)
If Rl = 22 ohms and Vf is the same,
With alkalines: I = 98 mA
With NiMH: I = 96 mA
All of these values seem too high, since I recall seeing an older post saying that the old design (with alkalines) drew 120 mA per LED, while the new design draws 90 mA per LED. Maybe I need to use a higher Vf or higher Ri. However, the qualitative trend is that the new design for the Streamlight 4AA should be much more tolerant of NiMH batteries. The NiMH batteries might even drive *less* current.
What does everyone else think?