Minimag LED multimode runtime (my first runtime test)

upriver

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
48
So I finally got my $20 amazon light meter (by Mastech). I was planning on getting a good one, probably an extech data logger, but I'm short on cash at the moment. I'm mainly interested in testing lights that don't have runtime graphs that I can find.

For this test, I manually checked the meter every 10 minutes because I didn't want to be running in there every minute or 5 minutes. This allowed me to study in between readings.

Since these are runtime tests, I'm most interested in relative values. The measurements are in lux, but all I'm doing is aiming the flashlight at the meter, at a distance of ~10cm under a meter, in a dark closet. I have not made a light box, and due to how I'm doing these tests and with the cheap meter I'm using, I dont expect the lux values to be accurate. With that said, if I test a light that has a known lux value that somebody with better equipment has found (or the manufacturer), I can adjust the test to get an initial value close to that.

So...Minimag LED multimode. My initial lux values were high, almost 3200 when the 1m value attained by the manufacturer is 2547. The ANSI standards to state that that measurement is taken after 30 seconds and mine was initial, but even after 10 minutes, I was at 2800.

The real puzzle to me is that the light didn't last anywhere near the claimed 18 hours to 10% output. Even if I start at the 10 minute lux value (to account for the fact that I didn't measure at 30 seconds), and even if I account for the fact that I'm approximating when 10% output occured (No measurement taken between 10 and 18 hours - sleeping), it isn't close. 10% output occured at around 670 minutes (11 hours) on fresh Duracell batteries.

So why did this happen?
The meter is cheap, but this can't account for more than a small error.
My testing site (light on a shelf in a dark closet) is certainly not as good as a light box, but this shouldn't affect relative measurements of lux (If I was trying to test overall output, this setup would not work at all...).

Let me know if you have any ideas on why this large discrepancy occured.


MinimagLEDmultimodegraph.jpg
 

enomosiki

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Mar 13, 2011
Messages
1,109
It could be because you were using alkaline batteries. Lithium batteries have better regulation for high-drain devices, such as flashlights and cameras.
 

Blue72

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
1,138
even for alkalines, it seems to have very poor regulation
 

upriver

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
48
It could be because you were using alkaline batteries. Lithium batteries have better regulation for high-drain devices, such as flashlights and cameras.

I agree, but maglites are designed to use alkalines, and I'm sure their ANSI standard runtime test of 18 hours used alkaline. For other, high-power lights, I'll use eneloops as well as alkalines/lithium.
 

Blue72

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Aug 24, 2007
Messages
1,138
makes me almost wonder if you have a defective light, because the only time I have seen a regulation like that on a maglite is with their incandescent models
 
Last edited:

upriver

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Dec 7, 2008
Messages
48
Here's a run with Duraloops. You can see flatter (but not flat) regulation, but with much reduced overall runtime compared to alkaline.

MinimagLEDmultimodegraph_Alk_NIMH.jpg
 

tre

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
May 3, 2010
Messages
1,222
Location
Northern IL USA
upriver, thanks for the test. It looks like there is some regulation on NiMh cells but I wonder if that is just the way the duraloop discharges. It does not look like there is any regulation at all when using alkaline cells.
 

Napalm

Enlightened
Joined
May 1, 2011
Messages
735
Location
Canada
upriver, thanks for the test. It looks like there is some regulation on NiMh cells but I wonder if that is just the way the duraloop discharges. It does not look like there is any regulation at all when using alkaline cells.

Doesn't look to me like there's any regulation at all. What you see with NiMh is the fact that once they get down to something like 1.15-1.2V they will hold that voltage steady for a long time until they get depleted and then they fall down quickly.

Alkalines just go down continuously without any plateau.

Nap.
 

Burgess

Flashaholic
Joined
Apr 10, 2006
Messages
6,548
Location
USA
to Upriver --

When you removed the exhausted Duracell Alkalines,
did you measure their (open circuit) voltage ? ? ?

Been my experience (with Alkalines),
that one cell in the "battery" often goes Belly-Up (near dead),
while the other cell(s) were still maintaining a nice, steady decrease.

Thereby causing such a massive voltage drop, the run-time test is effectively OVER.

I've seen this happen LOTS of times.
Regardless of brand name.

Even when i would carefully check each cell BEFORE use.


That would be my hunch.


Hope this is helpful.

Thank you for doing this test.
We appreciate your efforts.

But, hey -- stay AWAKE next time ! ! !

:wave:
_
 
Top