6P, M6, Scorpion Review in GX Magazine

dca2

Enlightened
Joined
Feb 23, 2006
Messages
204
Location
Shreveport, LA
GX magazine, April 2007, put the 6P, M6 and Scorpion through their set of tests: battery life, submersion, sandstorm, 6' drop and shoothouse. This magazine is published to report on news, events and topics relevant to National Guard members and their families.

Interesting notes:
Scorpion scorched a wooden surface and bubled and cracked its lense when left on for 5 minutes, bezel down. Others had no problems.

Drop test (light on): Scorpion bulb broke and M6 switch would no longer lock on; second drop was endcap down, new lights, out of the box: 6P bulb broke.

They liked the Streamlight's rubber grip for holding in mouth but not when dropped to the ground, it got coated in sand and dirt--hard to hold and clean.

Pelican M6 kept having problems with the switch, even before the drops.

6P took two hands to put into constant on

Conclusion: "...given its dramatically higher brightness, ease of use and low price, the Streamlight managed to edge out the other units as our overall winner, while Surefire, with its superior endcap switch and easier-to-grip-and-clean-body, was the unit we would choose to take into the field."
 
dca2, thanks for the post--very interesting.

When I first saw the title, I thought it was a strange grouping, as I assumed that the M6 was the SF M6...lol

My brother scorched a table the same way mentioned in the article, and ruined the lens. Streamlight told him to send the light back, and they would repair/replace it.

What I don't understand about the conclusion, is how they can pick Scorpion as the overall winner, when their choice is the 6P to take into the field. Price seems to be a factor, but since this magazine is geared towards the National Guard, I would think that work application would be most important. Hmm...

In any event, the Scorpion is one of my all-time favorites, and I usually choose it over the SF 6P for most applications. Caveat: I don't need "tactical."
 
What I don't understand about the conclusion, is how they can pick Scorpion as the overall winner, when their choice is the 6P to take into the field.

that part made me question who is really buying advertising space in their mag.
 
Did they show output/runtime charts for the three lights?
What about bulb lifespan tests?
Anything on water-resistance, resistance to salt-spray or sand-spray?
 
Sounds like a Redneck Test to me...
Gee mom this doesent light after i thumped my brothers head with it.


A more conclusive test would have made the Surefire win hands down.




:lolsign:

Benny
 
Last edited:
It's just like how your wife is the "overall winner" but she isn't necc the one you would like to "take to the field"... :laughing:

J/K :D

I'd take a 6P, preferably with an LED module for daily use and the incan module for foggy days.
 
MorpheusT1 said:
A more conclusive test would have made the Surefire win hands down.
That depends on what you're testing for. Fitness for purpose testing can be quite involved depending on what the purpose is, and how much confidence there has to be in the product's performance.

Most testing does not really take account of durability due to the difficulty, time-scale and costs involved. However, this characteristic is normally the most important. I used to work in structural testing for a test lab. Durability (aka wear and fatigue) tests often take several months.

Al
 
Size15's said:
Did they show output/runtime charts for the three lights?
What about bulb lifespan tests?
Anything on water-resistance, resistance to salt-spray or sand-spray?
I left the magazine in my classroom, so these comments are from memory. They have an aquarium filled with sand. They subjected the lights to the equivelant wind speed of a sandstorm for some period of time. All were ok.(they used the same test rig for tactical sunglasses) Submersion was lights on, 15 sec--like a drop in a puddle with a quick up and 1 minute total submersion ligts on--all passed. They left the lights on and watched for when they thought output was useless. Only you luminerds have the cool testing equipment :nana:

mdocod said:
that part made me question who is really buying advertising space in their mag.
The only ad space I recall is auto/home insurance and some colleges with distance learning programs--I'll check again tomorrow if I remember

flashfan said:
What I don't understand about the conclusion, is how they can pick Scorpion as the overall winner, when their choice is the 6P to take into the field. Price seems to be a factor, but since this magazine is geared towards the National Guard, I would think that work application would be most important. Hmm...
My thoughts exactly. I had to read it twice. Claim one the winner but wouldn't recomend taking it to the field???
 
Top