Joe,
I had the same sense of dread when I tried the 809 in 4x123. I could tell it was brighter than my KPR112 on 3x123, but just barely. The way I could best see the difference was outside in the deep dark. The 809 threw a little better but the difference was not stunning.
That's why I made the remark about trying it with 4x123+1AA in a 3C or 4C. I did this and it's noticeably brighter than the KPR112. 5x123 will blow an 809. Don't ask me how I know.
I think that this sort of illustrates the pitfalls of this hobbying around. To this point, nobody had reported any experience with the 809, just the 808. And that bulb seemed to have a 50/50 record of flashing. So, based on some measurements and calculations, we made a choice that should have been pretty good. Well, it's at least as good as the KPR112 and will take and extra 1.2V of push. But I think that's it.
And as for perceiving...if it don't look brighter to you, then it ain't. I wish I could say you were off base but I just don't think that will be proven to be the case.
I'm hoping that PaulW will do some electrical measurements to get to the bottom of this. As it stands, I think for 4x123 it comes down to the 808 or the 809. Neither one is exactly perfect, for different reasons. Now, if they had offered a 10V 1.2A bulb at 300Lu, I think that would have been perfect. Unfortunately, I don't know if that +/- 0.5V rating would even be within their manufacturing tolerance.
Wilkey