Not sure that you're really understanding the posts made supporting use of a real low-low. If you live in the city it's understandable, but basically we all buy lights for the same reason; to produce enough light to see according to the situation.
It's not that we buy lights to put out nearly no light, but rather to be able to adjust to our needs. I'm very used to walking by the light of the moon or aurora and sometimes that's the perfect amount of light, which I can now aproximate from my multi-level lights.
This thread is highly interesting and the posting above says it all...
In the Ralight Manual, you're told that the output is so variable that you can adjust it to your actual needs. Not enough light means not the right security, too much light means being blinded and unnecessary power consumption.
In 99% of the threads we speak about brightness, throw, output, runtime, the more, the better. That's normal, if you speak about cars, it's high speed, acceleration, consumption. Real life however is 99% not on the edge. Perhaps there are some people who only use their flashlights on maximum and wear sunglasses if necessary, but surely most of us know to adjust the output to our needs and so the highest output is probably the less used (and mostly for testing purposes).
Of course, the other edge, the low Low, is also a mode that's hardly used and there are actually enough explanations in this thread why the lowest Low possible is nevertheless very usefull sometimes. I'm also the one who uses by now the LF3XT (my Clickys are not programmed on Low as they are for a different use) on Low each night to go to the bathroom and as soon as my Quarks arrive, one of them will replace the LF3XT which is still to bright for me at night.
7777s knew what he did when he integrated the moon mode. For me, it was ONE reason to buy 3 Quarks, but there were others of course, as it wasn't the only thing he knew to do when he designed them! :thumbsup: