Fire-on-a-stick Review - A Layman's Perspective

[chaoss]

Well done, what are the regulated runtimes on this unit?

 

[HooNz]

To the OP , where is the "Pun Included" "Excuse the Pun" "Pun not intentional" or the Pun intentional with the "This bright idea" , really! those heathons probably knew how to construct a sensetance to yaknow :thumbsup:

Paul.

 

[jimmy1970]

Come on mods. Why hasn't this review been moved to the Review Section???

 

[leukos]

Is this another overseas knockoff of Surefire?

Will there be a clicky version released soon?

 

[HooNz]

A Titanium reflector at around 12"w by 6"h to do some spotlighting for T-rex (it is not commonly known that Titanium was around then) .

 

[Burgess]

Finally !

At Last !



Someone has developed a light which is truly

an EFFECTIVE defensive weapon ! ! !





_

 

[Nokoff]

lol best review ever...

I'd try a KD, er maybe FD aspherical lens for more throw

 

[Dude Dudeson]

To be serious - I can't count how many times I've used flame as a light source.

I've done it with cigarette lighters, candles, bonfires, and yes I've even tried to improvise a "torch" too - sometimes with success, sometimes with failure.

Excellent thread, in my opinion...

I want to re-explore the possibilities just because this thread was posted...

 

[jiuong]

Can anyone tell me how to attach a lanyard to it?
And what's the runtime of the light, somebody should send one to selfbuild for testing.:naughty:

 

[ronrog69]

I love the styling. Simple, yet distinct. You can tell the Creator took his time on this one. It just wasn't thrown together. It will certainly be a source of light that will be used for years to come.

:laughing: :lolsign:

 

[PCC]

Looks like it uses a forward-clicky to me...

 

[bodhran]

That knot looks like it could take a trit. Can anyone recomend a good quality sap to mount one.

 

[angelofwar]

Great...another X-Fire brand...give it up guys!

 

[think2x]

Great...another X-Fire brand...give it up guys!

If I'm not mistaken this IS the original xxx-fire and the others are copies.

 

[flashflood]

As this thread winds down, a tip of the hat to Aardvark for a very amusing post, and also to fellow CPFers for the many amusing comments. This was a good one.

 

[loganpass]

Build quality is spotty and it's hard to hold on to with a pitchfork in the other hand while the other villagers and I are storming the castle.

 

[dealgrabber2002]

It can't tail-stand. It doesn't have keyring attachment. Spotty anodize (I see more than 2 tones). It's doesn't run on rechargeable... just one time use. Quite disappointed. When was the last time they upgrade this torch? Seems so...ancient.


Oh good news guys. I found a portable version with low low mode. It's differ from other torches, the low low actually has less runtime. Don't know why, it just does. Here

 

[think2x]

Oh good news guys. I found a portable version with low low mode. It's differ from other torches, the low low actually has less runtime. Don't know why, it just does. Here

This is the best! I've never laughed so hard. :bow:

 

[angelofwar]

It can't tail-stand. It doesn't have keyring attachment. Spotty anodize (I see more than 2 tones). It's doesn't run on rechargeable... just one time use. Quite disappointed. When was the last time they upgrade this torch? Seems so...ancient.


Oh good news guys. I found a portable version with low low mode. It's differ from other torches, the low low actually has less runtime. Don't know why, it just does. Here

Yeah, but the lux at emitter must kick arse, and it's probably good at emitting IR!

 

[loganpass]

can't tail-stand. It doesn't have keyring attachment. Spotty anodize (I see more than 2 tones). It's doesn't run on rechargeable... just one time use. Quite disappointed. When was the last time they upgrade this torch? Seems so...ancient.


Oh good news guys. I found a portable version with low low mode. It's differ from other torches, the low low actually has less runtime. Don't know why, it just does. Here

Well that's just knots!