FUELON GAS SAVER

[FASTCAR]

I wrote about fuelon a few months ago. Several na-sayers here in the peanut gallery spoke badly as expected..never using it.

I have used this product for 10 years now in my personal and race cars.It always works.

Here is actual data from a $10 000 data logger off 1 of the race cars.this is all from a truck that gets a mixed loop.Roughly the same route weekly.40+ tanks of gas in a row..TESTED.

This canyon had 13 miles ( brand new) when test started.

First third is 87 Oct
Second third is 93 Oct
Last third is 87 Oct+fuelon power

I have not logged the last 3 tanks, MPG has gone up even more now.
http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/t99/wqan531/2006%20CANYON/My%20Mileage/b6790b6d95495cdccdaba6d182a.png

http://i158.photobucket.com/albums/...ON/My Mileage/b6790b6d95495cdccdaba6d182a.png


Here at my shop I have used Fuelon in easily 10 000 cars, trucks or boats(also a home heating oil product).I have seen with my own eyes on my gear, emissions drop 50-95%..not once but 100s of times.

EVERY single car gains power on the dyno..some more then others.
EVERY single car/truck gains M.P.G...also some more then others

I have seen from 10-35 horsepower to the ground and 2-9 M.P.G. gain.Gains vary alot..not sure why.Always works though.

B4 some 1 asks : This is used by 100s of countries, fleets of trucks, state police,military,cabs,power plants , homes and boats all over.


**I do not work for ,or get paid by fuelon : Not in any shape or form at all.

For me its about the power. Letting some borderline race cars pass state tests for the street is a nice side effect.I do not mind the MPG either.I run this product in my cars, trucks, boats, jet ski, lawnmower and small tools.Our Ohio house uses heating oil, I use a fuelon product for that also with GREAT savings.


B4 some 1 here quotes some bogus 1980 test from the EPA.
The EPA, FDA, FTC and others have interests.That interest is making money.If you think our G-Ment would not lie to us to make a buck..your a newbie.Not long ago, smoking was "good" for you.The list goes on.I will not go more into this..those that know..know.


I am ONLY writing this because I believe in this product.I know 100% for sure it works as stated.I have made CPF my family.If I found out how to extend life +100 years I would write about that also.
Need Apple Quicktime to view this.
http://www.fuelon.com/fuelonmovie.html

I must say I use more then the instructions tell you.Listed is 1OZ per tank of gas.From years of testing I have found its more like 2.5 OZ per 10 gallons of gas.

Some 1 here is foaming at the mouth,ready to "debunk" fuelon..im sure.( I would bet 500 bucks they never tried it).That said read below.

***I sent a sample 1 tank treatment to Mike at PTS flashlights.Feel free to ask him what happened.As far as I know he is a regular joe.Not some racer or scientist.


**I have found that all fuel related areas stay clean and dont get dirty.This alone is good for keeping a car running its best at all times.Will not hurt O2 sensor or gaskets.

Retail price is roughly 1$ an Oz.My SUV gains +4ish MPG on fuelon. It pays for itself for sure not to mention reducing green house gasses.

Huge thumbs up on this USA made product.:thumbsup:

Enough for now

My 2 cents

 

[zk188]

How does it work?

 

[TedTheLed]

 

[BB]

Not that it matters to anyone... But the EPA back in 1991 ran two vehicles on Fuelon for 1,000 miles each testing the claims for a cleaner running car and better fuel mileage...

The overall conclusion from these tests is that the Fuelon
Power gasoline fuel additive did not significantly reduce
vehicle emissions or improve fuel economy for either the FTP or
HFET. The additive clearly did not reduce vehicle exhaust
emissions nor produce the large -- greater than 15 percent --
fuel economy benefits claimed by the manufacturer. Therefore,
users of the Fuelon Power gasoline additive are unlikely to
realize either an emissions or fuel economy benefit in actual
driving. Vehicle operation and performance were unchanged by
the additive.

Here are the EPA of tests of various things to "improve" car engines... Seems to be mostly products from the 1980's and 1970's.

Here is a more recent Denver Post article (July 4, 2007) on fuel additives and other things:

The Environmental Protection Agency's Ann Arbor laboratory tested 93 additives, modifications and other products that claim to improve fuel economy. None received the agency's seal of approval.

The lab's analysis, spanning 30 years, found only 10 devices that showed even a small improvement in fuel economy, and four of those increased emissions.
...
Products flagged as scams include: ADAKS Vacuum Breaker Air Bleed, Electro-Dyne Superchoke mixture enhancer and Fuelon Power additive.

Regulators say finding those exact brands is unlikely (the names of faulty products tend to change quickly) but similar devices abound.

Sometimes regulators take punitive action, as the FTC did last year when it claimed a $4 million settlement from the makers of FuelMax, a product that claimed to increase gas mileage by 27 percent but didn't come anywhere close to that.

From what little I have read before... The fuel additives that have been found to help engines run cleaner (cleaning injectors, etc.), are now required to be added to all automotive fuels now. So adding additional detergents may not help anything in a normally operating engine--unless the vehicle currently has problems and a fuel detergent can help remove the deposits.

-Bill

 

[zk188]

I smell advertising.

 

[Marduke]

Retail price is roughly 1$ an Oz.My SUV gains +4ish MPG on fuelon. It pays for itself

You know what else gets you an extra +4mpg for free? Driving 5 mph slower. You'd be amazed if you went from driving 70+ mph to 55mph (for example, I settle for 60-65mph).

 

[FASTCAR]

The dyno, track and data logger dont lie.

If i was an oil comp. I would not want the hundreds of "pro" studies published either.This would mean a HUGE loss of money.

Rule #1 : increase profits for shareholders.If every person used less and less gas , profits would drop.Why would oil comps. get studies published that more or less would decrease profits.

Fuelon has 100s and 100s of studies done by 3rd parties proving it works.Even M.I.T. Im sure they will send ya some If you call.

I can say personally I have tested it 1000s of times..and it works.

Im curious BB can you say you have tried it and it didnt work?


***Drugs work the same way.Drug comps fund studies done and pay the salary of the FDA and FTC.One day so and so drug is the best ever and safe..years later ( viox and 50+ others) killed 1000s and caused problems for as many....Now they are off the market.


I do not use this because I get paid.I use it as a racer because it works, period.

Perhaps PTS mike will chime in

 

[zk188]

Strange the only studies i found were proving it a scam.

 

[MorePower]

Strange the only studies i found were proving it a scam.

That's because there are no reputable studies showing that it works, for you to find.

Looking at the posted graph, I have to wonder why Fuelon Power only improved the MPG 4 times out of 15 tanks of gas? That seems odd, for such a revolutionary product.

Here's a page with some good points to consider:
http://www.fuelsaving.info/conspiracy.htm

 

[FASTCAR]

Actually I was fooling with the amount used as test for myself.The huge spikes are all 2.5 OZ for 10 gals...others were 1Oz
I actually use in the race cars what works out to 3oz per 10 gals.

What makes me laugh is all CPFers want phots and charts always.

I include a chart with 100% proof and yall still yap away..now thats funny.


They have a 100% money back deal. :thumbsup:

**I was like some of yall years ago. I also thought it was snake oil like many products. Then I tried it...all I can say

Use it..or dont, I dont care. Just passing along info I know is 100% true as I have tested it personally.

 

[knot]

Why buy Fuelon when you can just buy pure acetone cheaply. Check google videos.

http://www.pureenergysystems.com/news/2005/03/17/6900069_Acetone/

 

[BB]

Nope, I have not used Fuelon... I posted all I knew about the product and my experiences (admittedly small) regarding fuel additives and what I have read.

Notice, I did not say it could not work. I just said that for normally running vehicles it probably does not really help.

Octane boosters (don't think Fuelon is one--but it is possible), do work--but that is only true for engines that are designed to run at compression ratios, boost levels, and engine temperatures where pre-ignition ("knocking") limits horse power because of the limitations in lower octane fuel.

In my days past, used to hang around an airport where you, if you could get it, ran 115/145 octane (think those numbers are correct) military aviation fuel for piston engines, you could run full military boost on the engines (P51, F4U Corsair, BearCat, Hawker SeaFury). The pilot/owners would put 150 gallon drop tanks on the wings (2 tanks each plane) and get "free fuel" for showing up at military air-shows.

Generally did not use military boost much--something like 300 GPH on the big radials (this is back when aviation fuel was still well under $2.00 per gallon).

Point me to any links of studies that say what Fuelon is made of, how it is supposed to work, and demonstrate Fuelon will help a normally running car--I would be willing to be proven wrong.

I have also seen fuel changes cause problems... Additives have etched fuel systems (methanol?), destroyed self sealing tanks (toluene?), old carburetors with varnished cork floats that sank with new fuels, aircraft engines that have valves seize mid flight when using 100LL AvGas (Low Lead replacement for the old 80 and 100 octane fuels). Then new low sulfur diesel fuel cause injection pump seals fail with 1-2 tank fulls of the new fuel.

Using any additive without knowledge of the content and possible effects is always a cr*pshoot.

Always willing to learn.

-Bill

 

[Fallingwater]

How is this not advertising?

 

[Led_Blind]

it could be advertising. What i want it the thory behind the idea and a test bed that eliminates the driver as an influence.

I am not suggesting you changed your driving habits for the test. I would believe the results more if this testing was done with the engine on a testbed where all variables are controled. Using a variety of engines like turbo, super, na, deisel will help explain your results as well as using different grade fuel.

Good luck!

 

[meuge]

I concur. Ban the scammer.

 

[zk188]

He should be:banned:

 

[FASTCAR]

I hope your not calling me a scammer. I have not "scammed " any person on CPF ever. Be carefull.

Nor do I sell Fuelon.

I thought cafe was an area to talk about whatever.

 

[goldenlight]

You know what else gets you an extra +4mpg for free? Driving 5 mph slower. You'd be amazed if you went from driving 70+ mph to 55mph (for example, I settle for 60-65mph).

At 65 MPH, the average vehicle uses 25% more fuel than at 55 MPH.

At 75 MPH, the average vehicle uses 40% more fuel than at 55 MPH.

That's why, during the earlier fuel crisis, speed limits were set to 55 MPH.

I happen to think they should be returned to 55 MPH.

It would greatly reduce our oil imports, and foreign trade imbalances.

The price of gasoline could go down, since the criminals (IMHO) who run the major oil companies and claim the reason for high fuel cost is due to lack of refinery capacity (...since Exon closed about 20 refineries in recent years, IIRC) there would be ample refinery capacity.

 

[FASTCAR]

Tried acetone years ago.It does work.Not as well though. Fuelon has some acetone in it along with 100+ other things.

 

[Mike Painter]

The dyno, track and data logger dont lie.

If i was an oil comp. I would not want the hundreds of "pro" studies published either.This would mean a HUGE loss of money.

And if I were an auto company spending billions to improve gas mileage I would incorperate a dispenser in the design of the vehicle.

Note also that a reduction in fuel use might reduce oil company costs because it would save them from building new refineries.

When I moved here 20 years ago PG&E insulated my roof and gave me a few other energy savings devices based on this idea.

EPA results