Jetbeam MK II X v 1.2

[Magichunter6]

Looks like there is a new version of the Jetbeam MK II X v 1.2 now available on Emilion's website. Looks like some minor changes have been made, including a sealed bezel, relocated spring and I think the same UI.

I however ordered an MK II X from Dealextreme and it was shipped yesterday.

 

[Weskix]

From the description on Emillions website, it seems that DX is selling the version 1.2 from his pictures. His website has a picture of a spring on the bezel end of the MKIIX he is selling.

 

[adnj]

The DX version is marked MK IIx e1.0

 

[Oculus Sinister]

The bezel seal is the difference, the spring is the same.

Spring attached at the bezel side, just like the MKII, bezel sealed

 

[Weskix]

Well even if a sealed bezel is the only difference, and 1.2 marked on the side (what happened to ver. 1.1 anyway) for a 25 dollar savings I can live with the 1.0. Emil's website pictures say 1.0 as well, but I guess he just didn't take pictures of this new awe inspiring version with a sealed bezel.

 

[cheapo]

a sealed bezel? what does that mean?

 

[Abumustafa]

a sealed bezel? what does that mean?

No replacing the Emitter or reflector i guess if it goes but hell the modders will still open it sumhow or the otha :lolsign:!!!

 

[boef800]

New Revision and still MOAUI's(Mother Of All UI's) PITA user interface ???
Way to go Jetbeam :rock::lolsign:

 

[rivethead147]

on the website shows "any AA type battery", the CL-E has a possibility of never being able to use a ~1.5v AA again once a ~3.6v battery like the 13500 is used, any idea if this is the case for the Mk IIx (i guess 1.0 as i git it from DX) or not at all?

 

[XtreMe_G]

the mk iix works fine with 3.6 batteries

 

[gunga]

I agree boef800.

The jetbeam at DX is very tempting but that UI is not for me. THe poor after-sale service also does not inspire me.

I got a C-LE before I knew any better and got lucky. Will probably avoid JB from now on...