looman
Enlightened
Looking for feedback re this unit and is it worth it.
Have a U2 and a Fenix P3D at the mo - both very good little units.
The output of the U2 is claimed at 100. I reckon nearer 80. The P3D is claimed 160 I would say nearer 90 - big exaggeration but both are excellent units.
i use the U2 for the spread and the P3D for a tighter beam and because it is sooo small.
I want a bit more throw though and I have been told that the MRV does produce 200 ish out of the front realistically.
Looking to use this to get a little more light out top 50/60 yards where the U2 and the Fenix struggle to reach.
Also looking for a reliable but cheapish unit as there is a real risk the unit might get damaged or lost in the field and the U2 makes me nervous.
What are you opinions of the MRV.
It will be used regularly so looking to run her on rechargable (probably protected cells).
I am not into filament bulbs - too yellow and the burn times are too short in comparison to LED.
Any feedback would be welcomed.
Thanks
Looman
Have a U2 and a Fenix P3D at the mo - both very good little units.
The output of the U2 is claimed at 100. I reckon nearer 80. The P3D is claimed 160 I would say nearer 90 - big exaggeration but both are excellent units.
i use the U2 for the spread and the P3D for a tighter beam and because it is sooo small.
I want a bit more throw though and I have been told that the MRV does produce 200 ish out of the front realistically.
Looking to use this to get a little more light out top 50/60 yards where the U2 and the Fenix struggle to reach.
Also looking for a reliable but cheapish unit as there is a real risk the unit might get damaged or lost in the field and the U2 makes me nervous.
What are you opinions of the MRV.
It will be used regularly so looking to run her on rechargable (probably protected cells).
I am not into filament bulbs - too yellow and the burn times are too short in comparison to LED.
Any feedback would be welcomed.
Thanks
Looman