signal 13
Enlightened
- Joined
- Jun 28, 2008
- Messages
- 291
M3T vs M4
Recently I've stopped using rechargeables for my duty lights. I've been using the M3T/MN16 because I just love the higher*output. It just sucks that the MN16 runs on 9 batteries per hour! That's more than the M6 runs on the low output lamp. After thinking about it I decided it would be better to run the MN60 in an M4. The MN60 is $3 cheaper (from Surefire anyway) and only runs on 4 batteries per hour at 225 lumens (same as the MN16).
So I recently bought another M4 body which will give me more options. I love the look of the M3T, but the M4 can be run in all the M3T configurations if needed (with a dummy battery). And you'll get longer runtime with th M4 if you decide to throw a couple of 17670s in to run the MN15 or the MN16 as opposed to 17500s. Plus, it slips in and out of duty pants pockets easier with it's smooth body.
Just some stuff to consider for LEOs or anybody trying to decide between the M3T & M4...*
Recently I've stopped using rechargeables for my duty lights. I've been using the M3T/MN16 because I just love the higher*output. It just sucks that the MN16 runs on 9 batteries per hour! That's more than the M6 runs on the low output lamp. After thinking about it I decided it would be better to run the MN60 in an M4. The MN60 is $3 cheaper (from Surefire anyway) and only runs on 4 batteries per hour at 225 lumens (same as the MN16).
So I recently bought another M4 body which will give me more options. I love the look of the M3T, but the M4 can be run in all the M3T configurations if needed (with a dummy battery). And you'll get longer runtime with th M4 if you decide to throw a couple of 17670s in to run the MN15 or the MN16 as opposed to 17500s. Plus, it slips in and out of duty pants pockets easier with it's smooth body.
Just some stuff to consider for LEOs or anybody trying to decide between the M3T & M4...*