Mule in CR2 size?

[K-T]

I am not sure if this has been discussed here before and I am sure that Mr.Gizmo has better stuff to do than to resize a successful light, yet I feel like asking: would CR2 sized Mule be possible or even practical? Would the CR2 be able to handle the Mule?

 

[McGizmo]

K-T,
Doable and viable.

 

[charlesn]

K-T, just curious: since the Mule is a fairly small light as it is, what do you see as the upside in further reducing its size to CR2 when the price to be paid is significantly reduced runtime?

 

[greenLED]

...the upside in further reducing its size to CR2...

Seeking an even smaller form factor?

 

[chocho]

Heh heh. . . I made one here.

Not in the same caliber as the Master Gizmologist, but, gets the job done for reading late at night.:sleepy:

-Chris

 

[K-T]

The idea was that since the Mule doesn't have/need a reflector, the bezel size is only limited by the circuit. The Mule concept of having no reflector gives a great advantage since you don't have to think about how to handle photon management.

Why smaller? Why not?

The PD system is great, instant two level light, hasslefree, with a twist of the head you've got your constant light. Easy, simple. K.I.S.S.

K-T,
Doable and viable.

... so, what are you waiting for? :nana: :bow: