I am not sure about the difference in runtime betwwen the two. I use my Malkoff 3D (original version...not drop in) all the time and I have to say that I am VERY satisfied with both the runtime and the output of the Malkoff. I have found that I get between 3 and 4 hours of solid output with about an hour of slightly diminishing light. I have yet to ever let it go any further without changing to fresh Alkaline cells. I am sure the Terralux is a nice product but I love my Malkoff.
Are you sure it isn't more run-time than that? We're talking about a 3D size mag right?
I'd say so. The terralux drop-ins isn't being pushed as hard as the malkoff. Here's a review of the terralux drop-ins for 2-3 cell and 3-6 cell maglites. I can't say that they're accurate for the current terralux drop-ins, but I think they should give you a good idea of what kind of runtime to expect.have not found the exact number but i'm assuming that the terralux will have a longer runtime in either a 2D or 4D maglite than the malkoff.
correct?
thanks!
3D with the current Malkoff drop in.
Duracell Copper Top Alkaline - based on first reading at about 1 min.
80% @ 1 hr
70% @ 3 hr
60% @ 6 hr
mb
3D with the current Malkoff drop in.
Duracell Copper Top Alkaline - based on first reading at about 1 min.
80% @ 1 hr
70% @ 3 hr
60% @ 6 hr
mb
Ooops, did do a gaff. I was puzzling over the graphs you emailed me (which I very much appreciate), when it dawned on me. Gene you idiot, you're thinking of the driver in the original mag mods. The downsizing to fit in the dropin uses a different driver, not flat regulation, like the original mods were. So my apologies and yes I do think this jives with the current setup. Please post the graphs.
Gene