There was only one review on Amazon. Would you say this is an accurate and fair review?
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B002UMAIH6/?tag=cpf0b6-20
I thought that these statement were very inconsistent with what I have read in here:
"At about 50ft or over, TK30's beam dispersed out so much that it had no use"
"But after 50ft, Tk30 could no longer light up the target object effectively"
Am I missing something?
I'm guessing the reviewer meant to say Yards or Meters, not feet.
It is true that the designers of the TK40 to make the fixed focus light more useful over a broader range of distances purposely did not collimate the spot to stay the same size.
Instead it opens up very slowly which in the end results in less through than it would have had if it was focused to infinity.
That being said I believe the compromise was made to make the light more useful.
The reflector is so darn efficient and the light so bright that it can afford to open up and let the hotspot brightly illuminate a bit more of square footage.
Personally I wouldn't have minded one bit if they tightened it up a bit, but that being said, what they did makes it a much more usefull light and the throw is still tremendous because even though the beam opens up it is still tighter than many other lights and usually 2x-3x brighter.
The 50ft. thing is definitly a mistake, you can cast a super bright spot at that distance , not even on turbo, without breaking a sweat.
Even at 200 yards you can light up at area significantly. It's no longer a spot at that distance, but it is still tight enough to light a very useful area effectively.
You know alot of weaker lights can put a pinpoint spot at a distance that is highly visable and rather useless. At range the TK40 may cover a broader area compared to a brighter pinprick of focused light next to it. But in a scenario such as what this light is designed to do, the pinprick is a geek test, and the ability to see objects over a 10-15 foot area at 100 yards is a useful thing.
Hope this helps.