What do you guys think!!

jf2oo6

Newly Enlightened
Joined
Aug 1, 2010
Messages
18
So I work the night shift working on aircraft, so I have always used flashlights. For the past year or so I have had a mini mag light led. It worked great the whole time, but I am very rough on this thing. It takes around 10 ft drops on the regular. Just the other day it took one drop too many, and stopped working.

So I was looking for something that had a good mix of flood and beam, could take a beating, used AA's as I get them for free at work, and had a decent battery life.

After some research on here I decided on the Fenix L2D CE Q5. I hope this light does everything I need it too. And I really hope it is durable as these things seem to fall out of my hand, or out of my cranial (helmet type thing) a lot when I work.

What do all you guys think?
 
I think it will fair better than your minimag and the extra strobe features might come in handy for your type of work.

You could always get rechargeable Li-ion cells and run them in something like an RA Clicky, very tough lights with multi levels and long runtime,

Depends what your happy with and how much you want to spend. I dont need lights all the time but now I try to get every opportunity to use my great collection, so if I were in your shoes and used a light all the time I would make a big investment now rather than lots of little investments along the way
 
Last edited:
If you're going for XP-G light, and don't like donuts in the hotspot, go for one with OP reflector, I think ld20 has OP.

If you need to be hands free, have you given any though to headlamp or angle light?
 
Have you considered a headlamp? Like a Zebralight, etc? You could use a headlamp in addition to a L2D. Can't have too many flashlights you know. :)
 
Translation of the above:

The XP-G emitter is known for having a bit of a donut-hole at short range which means you have a dark spot in the middle.
Many such lights use a "Orange Peel" reflector which is one that has texturing instead of being smooth. This helps even out the beam and make it look nicer.

It is a good point that I assumed you were looking further off. If a headpiece is what you need, consider the new itp.

http://goinggear.com/index.php?main_page=product_info&cPath=14_19&products_id=1162
It will have fairly limited runtime due to using 1xAAA so consider this. $30 bucks.

Alternatively the Zebralight company specializes in head-based lighting. Here is a link for you to browse through:

http://goinggear.com/index.php?main_page=index&cPath=14_20
 
Well when i work i usually wear a cranial. it has built in ear muffs, so i can slide the light in between the metal bracket for the muffs, and my head. it works most of the time, but is also the reason for the occasional drop. most of my work is close up, but i do occasionally need to see far away. so hopefully this light has a good mix of flood and throw.
 
I think the L2D was a good light and still is a good light but there are even better and brighter available now. It's no slouch and would have been recommended by just about everyone maybe two years ago, and it's still quite bright and quite useful.

However, if I were you I'd probably pick up a Quark Turbo AA, but that's just me.
 
I think it will fair better than your minimag and the extra strobe features might come in handy for your type of work.

You could always get rechargeable Li-ion cells and run them in something like an RA Clicky, very tough lights with multi levels and long runtime,

Depends what your happy with and how much you want to spend. I dont need lights all the time but now I try to get every opportunity to use my great collection, so if I were in your shoes and used a light all the time I would make a big investment now rather than lots of little investments along the way

+1 im with abarth, the Ra Clicky is bulletproof and has changed how I look at flashlights. I have quite a few, but as soon as someone says they need a light that "can take a beating" the Ra Clicky is no doubt the one.

but i understand the downside of not being able to use free cells from work. still, at least check out Henry's website!:welcome:
 
Yea sorry about the double thread. I was having some trouble posting the first time. But I guess it worked.
 
The RA clicky is only 140 lumens compared to the L2D 180. Wouldnt the L2D be brighter?

And yea the quark does look a little better. But it is a little more than I wanted to spend right now. although not terrible at 75 bucks. oh well. maybe next time.
 
It is very very hard to beat a HDS clicky (Ra clicky). If more lumens is what you would need then you may look at the 170 lumens tactical version. The problem is the 170 one uses a smaller Osram Golden Dragon Plus LED which gives you a tighter beam for more throw. It is not really that suitable for close up work.

The 140 lumens with wider beam profile uses the Seoul Semiconductor P4 (SSC P4) LED. It is in itself bright enough even though lumen wise it doesn't seem to be as impressive as the Fenix. One of the reason Ra lights are never very bright is due to the fact that Henry, the designer and manufacturer, believes in reliability so he does not overdrive the LED which may cause it to overheat and getting it "cooked" to death in the light.

Honestly, between 180 and 140 lumens, the number may seem greatly different but our eyes could hardly detect the difference. Our eyes are logarithmic and it would take at least double the brightness for us to make out any difference. So, if you would need a light that is visually brighter than the 140 lumen Ra light, it would have to have at least 250 to 280 lumen output to make a real difference.
 
The XR-E LD20's (Q5's and R2's) were rated at emitter lumens. Between not having a 100% reflective reflector and lens losses, a good rule of thumb is about 20% loss from emitter lumens to out the front lumens.

The Ra will do 140/170 for 10 seconds, then have a slight (as in barely perceptible) drop to 100/120 lumens. They will then do that dead flat output for at least an hour, before gradually stepping down to lower outputs over the course of time. Realistically, because the Ra's have constant output, versus the gradually dimming output of most other lights (in which runtimes are rated by a drop of 50% of output), the Ra is much more efficient, and uses a cell more efficiently.

I would also suggest the Ra140. The extra step from 100 to 120 lumens continuous is not worth the money, unless you really want the higher output and greater efficiency of the 170.

The wide or narrow beam pattern is entirely up to you. The Wide uses a Seoul P4 LED, which produces an incredibly smooth hotspot-to-spill transition. The Narrow uses a Diamond Dragon emitter with the same reflector, but focuses slightly tighter than the wide. It doesn't have an extremely tiny, laser-like beam, but instead has a nice, intense hotspot surrounded by a medium intensity corona, and a nicely illuminated spill. My 140 narrow easily throws 150 feet in an urban environment, with lots of other streetlights, etc.

The Ra's also have automatic rechargeable battery detection and protection, to keep a Lithium ion cell from being over-discharged and therefore damaged.

Henry (the owner) also has said that 2 AA battery compartments will be available soon, meaning that you could have a CR123/RCR123 battery compartment, for EDC, a 17670 compartment, for longer runtimes, while using Li-ion cells, and a 2AA tube, for the ultimate in versatility, and cell scrounging.

The Ra's are some of the most durable, user friendly, user customizable lights on the market. Their build quality is on par with Surefire, as is their customer service and support.

The User Interface can be set up to your standards. Each of the four modes can be changed in output, or have any of three strobes programmed in. You can set it up so it always turns on at a certain output, or remembers what setting it was on last. If it gets set in the bottom of a dark tool case, you can set up the locator flash, so that it's easy to find, without draining the battery. You can set it up so that it will activate only as long as the button is pushed (momentary), which will work on any mode (if memory is enabled, by disabling "force" setting). The booklet it comes with makes it seem intimidating to program and use, but I was able to learn it within 20 minutes when I was half asleep, and can now reprogram it at will, from memory.

The lights are waterproof to 66 feet, the glass lens is 3mm thick, and protected on both sides by O-rings, so no worries about cracking it. The battery is protected from damage by springs on both ends, and the electronics are fully potted, so no worries about damaging it. It has Hard Anodizing level III, which is, if I remember correctly, as hard as diamond.
 
glad to see so many other flashaholics recommend the Ra as well. Henry has put together an amazing piece of technology here. it has truly made me re-evaluate my collection. Besides a couple lights for specialized purposes, i find myself always reaching for my Clickys first!
 
i find myself always reaching for my Clickys first!

Yep me to the HDS seems to be dominating CPF right now and it seems like it happened so suddenly. No doubt though it does deserve to dominate I would suggest to the OP if it is within his budget go ahead and get one, the other light's certainly have their place I still carry them but the HDS is head and shoulders above them in just about everything.
 
So I work the night shift working on aircraft, so I have always used flashlights. For the past year or so I have had a mini mag light led. It worked great the whole time, but I am very rough on this thing. It takes around 10 ft drops on the regular. Just the other day it took one drop too many, and stopped working.

So I was looking for something that had a good mix of flood and beam, could take a beating, used AA's as I get them for free at work, and had a decent battery life.

After some research on here I decided on the Fenix L2D CE Q5. I hope this light does everything I need it too. And I really hope it is durable as these things seem to fall out of my hand, or out of my cranial (helmet type thing) a lot when I work.

What do all you guys think?
Have you looked into Olights? I have 3 of them, two I use on weapons (M16 and M14) and they hold up really well, my only concern is battery usage. But I am in the process of switching over to rechargeable...
 

Latest posts

Top