Hi there, first time posting here at CPF. I've been lurking for a while, and decided to start asking some questions as I begin building my first "real" set of lights. I did some searches and didn't see this exact question anywhere - but if it has been addressed, please just point me in the right direction...there are so many great posts here that it's hard to know where everything is.
I'm looking at the Zebralight headlamps as one of my next purchases (I just brought home today an Inova 24/7 for my car; and I have a 4Sevens Quark Mini123 for my pocket and a Quark 123 Tactical for my nightstand coming in the mail soon). I'm looking at the Zebralight as a travel & around-the-home light, and the flood-y aspect of the design really appeals to me.
After looking at the Zebralight site and at various reviews & posts, this is what I could figure out: the original headlamp product was the H50, and it had/s a 120 degree flood spread. It came with an anti-glare shield to keep the extreme edge of the pattern out of the user's eyes when working on the headband. Then, starting with the H30 and on every subsequent product, the anti-glare shield was 'built-in' and the flood spread was reduced to 80 degrees.
So if I have it right, only the original H50 has the potential for the 'extreme' width flood pattern. This leads me to my key question: taking into account the advancements that Zebralight has been putting into the later models, which approach do you think is better - having the unit start with the 120 degree potential and letting the user 'stop down' to 80 degrees with the add-on piece [presuming that is how the manual anti-glare shield actually worked], or hard-setting the unit to 80 degrees so that you don't have to futz around with an external piece that has to be set in place, can be lost, etc.?
At the moment, Zebralight is still offering the original H50 with variants, so I'm looking for some thoughts/feedback while I make a choice. Since it seems like they are not going back to the original 120 degree approach on any future model, the H50 may be the one and only option they'll provide - so I'd like to hear the pros & cons while that is still a choice.
Thanks in advance, and thanks for such a great resource.
I'm looking at the Zebralight headlamps as one of my next purchases (I just brought home today an Inova 24/7 for my car; and I have a 4Sevens Quark Mini123 for my pocket and a Quark 123 Tactical for my nightstand coming in the mail soon). I'm looking at the Zebralight as a travel & around-the-home light, and the flood-y aspect of the design really appeals to me.
After looking at the Zebralight site and at various reviews & posts, this is what I could figure out: the original headlamp product was the H50, and it had/s a 120 degree flood spread. It came with an anti-glare shield to keep the extreme edge of the pattern out of the user's eyes when working on the headband. Then, starting with the H30 and on every subsequent product, the anti-glare shield was 'built-in' and the flood spread was reduced to 80 degrees.
So if I have it right, only the original H50 has the potential for the 'extreme' width flood pattern. This leads me to my key question: taking into account the advancements that Zebralight has been putting into the later models, which approach do you think is better - having the unit start with the 120 degree potential and letting the user 'stop down' to 80 degrees with the add-on piece [presuming that is how the manual anti-glare shield actually worked], or hard-setting the unit to 80 degrees so that you don't have to futz around with an external piece that has to be set in place, can be lost, etc.?
At the moment, Zebralight is still offering the original H50 with variants, so I'm looking for some thoughts/feedback while I make a choice. Since it seems like they are not going back to the original 120 degree approach on any future model, the H50 may be the one and only option they'll provide - so I'd like to hear the pros & cons while that is still a choice.
Thanks in advance, and thanks for such a great resource.