DEFT Review and Basic Comparisons

Patriot

Flashaholic
Joined
Feb 13, 2007
Messages
11,254
Location
Arizona
More beamshots on page 2


Short review of the DEFT Q5 WC from Michael at OMG Lumens.


DEFTReview002.jpg





Today I received my long awaited secret weapon from Michael at OMG Lumens and thought I'd share my impressions.







First impressions:

The Bezel is amazing! The carbon weave is very cool and the polished finish has a deep luster. It looks like it could adorn the engine air intake tube on a Formula One car. It fits very nicely to the head of the light and there are no open seams or gaps around its circumference. Very impressive fit with regards to the bezel, lens and flashlight head.

DEFTReview007.jpg

DEFTReview003.jpg


It's smaller than I thought it would be. Although I saw many pictures of the DEFT before, I suppose I was expecting it to be longer than it was. Although not compact because of the bezel diameter you can easily tuck the battery tube into a front or back jean pocket should you need a free hand.

DEFTReview001.jpg


The quality and feel of the switch was a big surprise. It's small enough to not be obtrusive while still large enough to quickly find in the dark while capturing my beamshots. It's firm enough that it wont be activated accidentally and protrudes enough from the body that makes it easy to find by touch.

At first I was slightly worried about the threads because when I cleaned them with a cloth, loose silver bits of machined aluminum attached to the cloth. After a good cleaning and some fresh Nyogel, they work great and there's not much play to speak of. It does have a recessed and very functional lanyard attachment point in the center of the tailcap that's quite beefy.

The exterior of the light itself is fairly average of something that we might see on some of the cheaper lights at DX. That is to say that it's not going to win any beauty prizes for most elaborate design or machining. The cuts are shallow and some, like the small ones around the tailcap or poorly defined. Actually they appear to be cast rather than machined. The square blocks designed into the handle provide slightly more friction than if the tube was smooth. In my opinion the light could really benefit from a spin on the lathe to clean up the strange designs and cut down past some of the small dents and metal imperfections that occurred prior to finishing. I'm probably making this sound much worse than it actually is because only tight macro shots would reveal what I'm talking about. I'm just trying to be objective in saying that this thing isn't machined like a Surefire, JetBeam or JilLite. For that matter it's probably not as cleanly cut as a Fenix, Olight or EagleTac, all of which are pretty good in my opinion. (More on this subject at the end of the review)


The finish or more specifically the anodizing is quite good. It appears to be thick, durable and uniform in pleasant satin black color.

The battery holder is an average 4 x AA holder which utilizes small coil springs and tabs to firmly hold the cells in.

DEFTReview006.jpg



The battery contacts inside of the battery tube are long and skinny. The attachment point of each wire is small so it would be best to go easy on these things when dropping the loaded battery holder down into the tube. They seem durable enough as long as they're not snagged by anything or pushed down to hard. On a side note to having the tailcap off, care should be taken because small debris can fall past the switch and light engine directly onto the inside of the aspherical lens. Whatever you do don't spray any lubricant or deoxit down there with the head on because it will end up finding its way on the lens. (Murphys Law) In the picture below I placed a small LED button cell light near the front of the lens so that the gaps (bright spots) could be easily seen from the battery side.

DEFTReview008.jpg



The aspheric itself is BIG. It's not as transparent or crystal clear as the glass PL-1072 on the Mac's but it doesn't seem to hurt the performance when compared to any other aspheric light. Yes, it would perform even better with high quality optical glass but at the DEFT's price point I'm not going to complain. I'm very impressed with it overall.

DEFTReview005.jpg




Beamshots:

First set was against a garage door at 36 yards.

Mac's Aspheric with Cree Q4
DEFTReview009.jpg


DEFT Q5 WC
DEFTReview010.jpg


Both together
DEFTReview011.jpg



Second set is aimed at a powerline tower 319 yards

Mac's Aspheric
DEFTReview014.jpg


DEFT
DEFTReview015.jpg



Sky shots

Mac's Aspheric
DEFTReview012.jpg


DEFT
DEFTReview013.jpg




Overall I'm utterly amazed by the performance of the DEFT. This is the first single LED light that's able to out throw my 10W JiL EzNite with Polarion reflector. The color of the beam on the garage door shots is pretty accurate while the powerline tower and sky shots are much bluer than actual.

Regarding the quality of the light chassis itself it's good enough for me. If this light had a custom body and head on it I could easily see the price shooting well above $500 and possibly into the Elephant price range. I actually feel like I received more than my money's worth and the quality of Michael's build and assembly work is extraordinary. It's on par with any of the custom builders who's lights I already own. I want to thank Michael for exceeding my expectations for both build quality and performance.


More to come later, I just wanted to get my main thoughts down.

Enjoy the pics :)
 
Last edited:
More beamshots on page 2

Ok, time for some more pictures.


For starters let's looks at the lens a bit more closely. As this pictures shows it's clear while looking straight through. At an angle or when the light is on is does appear opaque.
DEFTReview022.jpg



This picture through lens shows the anomalies in the optical plastic but to see this the light has to be just right. You'd never see it at first glance and it isn't a weakness. Many thickly cast optical plastics have this characteristic.
DEFTReview021.jpg



Here are some close-ups of the light host:
DEFTReview019.jpg

DEFTReview017.jpg

DEFTReview020.jpg

DEFTReview018.jpg



Here is the tailcap with lanyard attachment point. Upon closer inspection it appears to be molded plastic which is then secured to the aluminum cap. Still, it looks like it's tough and shouldn't pull off depending on how it's attached. I'm guessing it's hot pressed or glued.
DEFTReview016.jpg



Here is the emitter and heat sink. Observational note: Mine appears to be a departure from the larger copper heatsink with four screws. The Glow powder is cleanly applied. The after glow of the glowpowder was a big surprise. It's so bright that when the light is shut off it reminds me of my Maxabeam shutting down with its bright afterglow. It stays glowing pretty well for about 20 minutes after it's turned off.
DEFTReview024.jpg



Here is an interesting shot with Michael's company name and serial number stuck inside of the head.
DEFTReview023.jpg



One additional small thing that I noticed was that the LED was aligned with the switch so that when the switch is facing straight up at 12 O'clock, the LED die image (square with a foot) is projected with the foot at the bottom. In the past when I've used aspherical LED lights I always intuatively turn the light body until the projection is square and with the foot at the bottom (as in my beamshots) With the DEFT I don't have to turn the body at all since it was already thoughtfully planned to appear that way. Very Cool!!!


Beamshots are still coming but I'm waiting for it to get dark at the moment.
 
Last edited:
Wow!

Gorgeous light and insane power!

Color me impressed.

Thanks for the nice review and beautiful beamshots.

:hitit:
 
Good beamshots I've wondered how it compared to a M@g aspheric and your wall shot comparing the projected die size tells me just what I've been curious about. Domo arigato.
I agree that the workmanship on the light is high quality. There is a lot of attention to detail put into all of the electrical components. Definitely worth the price tag.
 
Yes thanks for the great review Patriot36. I agree with the price point vs quality of the host housing. I figure your buying the overall design and if a person likes the performance you could probably have a custom housing made. I read where Michael may be making his own custom housings in the future? Now the only problem is I'm at the end of the waiting list and it's going to be long while before I get my new toy. Hopefully more owner's review their Deft's.
 
Can you cloud bounce it?


If the clouds were 1000 feet or less above ground level I suspect it would be possible. We rarely get low clouds here but when we do I always like trying to hit them with lasers or the Maxabeam. I'll have to give the DEFT a try next time. :)
 
Great photos Patriot36.The one with the DEFT lighting up the tower reminds me of a photo on the Polarion website.How do you think it would fair against a PH50?
 
Great photos Patriot36.The one with the DEFT lighting up the tower reminds me of a photo on the Polarion website.How do you think it would fair against a PH50?
Hate to say it but the Polarion would blow the DEFT away. Then again the price points are waaaay different. The tower shots are a bit overexposed and makes it seem a bit brighter than it is in real life.

Very good review Patriot36. I thought it was balanced and honest. Thanks for the comparison shots too. It helps to give perspective.:thumbsup:
 
Yes, what Saabluster said with regards to the PH50. The DEFT is king of LED throwers but HID is a whole different rhelm. The Xenide 25W and AE24 both out throw the DEFT fairly easily in my preliminary comparisons which I haven't posted yet.

As Michael stated the tower and sky shots are both overexposed. In fact, they're way over exposed by a factor of 3x. The intention was only to show the difference between the Mac's and the DEFT which is better done by big, bright, blown out images rather than faint ones. In my extended review I'll be taking some shots that replicate as closely as possible what the eyes see.




Michael, I can't seem to stop shining the DEFT around at things or even set it down for that matter...lol. This is quite the creation!

Thanks again :)
 
Thanks for the review Patriot36.
I have ordered quite a few lights since I got into this hobby (or craze as some may put it ).
But I can honestly say that I have never been so anxious to receive a light as much as this one.
I work with a fellow CPF'r, and not a day goes by without us talking about it ( he will receive his a little before me ).
We were planning to have a light saber fight in the sky on a half mile stretch of beach where we live.
 
Excellent review, and superb beamshots! Fascinating light, and performance that fully lives up to its great reputation.

I didn't know the lens was very slightly opaque like that. It makes you wonder what the throw would be like it it was completely clear...

I'll move this to the Reviews section.
 
Thanks for the review Patriot36.

I work with a fellow CPF'r, and not a day goes by without us talking about it ( he will receive his a little before me ).
We were planning to have a light saber fight in the sky on a half mile stretch of beach where we live.


lol that's funny! Remember that my photos are very over exposed in order to see the difference in detail between the two beams. The actual beam shaft isn't anywhere near than vivid in the sky. I'll be taking some pictures tonight that closely replicate what the eyes see. :)




DM51
Excellent review, and superb beamshots! Fascinating light, and performance that fully lives up to its great reputation.

I didn't know the lens was very slightly opaque like that. It makes you wonder what the throw would be like it it was completely clear...


Thanks DM51,
The lens does have a slight cloudiness to it and the pictures seem to amplify that appearance some. When looking straight through it at the LED is doesn't really look opaque at all though. I'll take some more pictures later to try and show that.
 

addictedmatt
, could you tell me how to remove the lens. It looks like it just unscrews but I didn't want to force anything. Then I was going ask saabluster today but forgot.

:thanks:
 
Some Part Two review pictures in post two now.

Beamshots will be added there later this evening.

:wave:


EDIT: Four more beamshots posted.
 
Last edited:
Top