WadeF
Flashlight Enthusiast
I decided to take some LUX readings at 1M, 3M, and 10M to see how these two lights compare.
I started with two fully charged AW 18650 batteries, 4.20v on the meter.
The DBS has a Q5 WF 3-Stage pill installed. I will try and do more tests with some of their other pills, like a 2SD Q5 WC. Here are the results:
DBS 1M Startup: 25,900lux + 2-3%
Raidfire 1M Starup: 25,200lux
DBS 1M 2min: 25,500lux +8%
Raidfire 1M 2min: 23,600lux
DBS 3M 3min: 2,950lux +13%
Raidfire 3M 3min: 2,610lux
DBS 10M 4min: 285lux +22%
Raidfire 10M 4min: 234lux
As you can see the difference between the DBS and the Raidfire increased as the distance increased. The DBS maintains a tighter hot spot than the Raidfire (at least with my DBS and my Raidfire) which gives the DBS an edge when the target is farther away.
I'd be interested to see results from others with multiple throwers and a LUX meter if they can take readings at 3M and 10M. 10M is about as far as I can test in my basement at the moment. It would be interesting to try 50M or something outdoor sometime.
Here are some beam shots at 10M:
Color saturation removed to eliminate tint differences:

Same shot, darkened to help show difference in intensity:

Unfortunately a digital camera isn't as sensative as our eyes, or a lux meter, so the difference in the picture is subtle.
The DBS still has some room for improvement. If Dereelight can offer us coated lenses at some point (which the Raidfire has, and I think that is what is helping it do as well as it does, considering the hot spot is larger), as an upgrade, and standard with new lights, they could probably gain another 1,000LUX or more at one meter. Also when they have R2 and higher bin Cree's available the DBS will be easily upgraded to a brighter emitter for the fraction of the cost of a new light.
Some other notes, during the tests the Raidfire got noticeably warmer than the DBS due to it having much less material to absorb the heat. The DBS got barely warm, the Raidfire was noticeably warm to very warm, but not hot.
I started with two fully charged AW 18650 batteries, 4.20v on the meter.
The DBS has a Q5 WF 3-Stage pill installed. I will try and do more tests with some of their other pills, like a 2SD Q5 WC. Here are the results:
DBS 1M Startup: 25,900lux + 2-3%
Raidfire 1M Starup: 25,200lux
DBS 1M 2min: 25,500lux +8%
Raidfire 1M 2min: 23,600lux
DBS 3M 3min: 2,950lux +13%
Raidfire 3M 3min: 2,610lux
DBS 10M 4min: 285lux +22%
Raidfire 10M 4min: 234lux
As you can see the difference between the DBS and the Raidfire increased as the distance increased. The DBS maintains a tighter hot spot than the Raidfire (at least with my DBS and my Raidfire) which gives the DBS an edge when the target is farther away.
I'd be interested to see results from others with multiple throwers and a LUX meter if they can take readings at 3M and 10M. 10M is about as far as I can test in my basement at the moment. It would be interesting to try 50M or something outdoor sometime.
Here are some beam shots at 10M:
Color saturation removed to eliminate tint differences:
Same shot, darkened to help show difference in intensity:
Unfortunately a digital camera isn't as sensative as our eyes, or a lux meter, so the difference in the picture is subtle.
The DBS still has some room for improvement. If Dereelight can offer us coated lenses at some point (which the Raidfire has, and I think that is what is helping it do as well as it does, considering the hot spot is larger), as an upgrade, and standard with new lights, they could probably gain another 1,000LUX or more at one meter. Also when they have R2 and higher bin Cree's available the DBS will be easily upgraded to a brighter emitter for the fraction of the cost of a new light.
Some other notes, during the tests the Raidfire got noticeably warmer than the DBS due to it having much less material to absorb the heat. The DBS got barely warm, the Raidfire was noticeably warm to very warm, but not hot.
Last edited: