I see that Klarus XT32 uses a typical reflector design, which makes it different than Malkoff HD Super.
The lens design of Malkoff gives a very wide spill, but not as intense as with reflector. And I assume also a beefier hotspot(someone can tell about that) than Klarus. These lights therefore have different beam characters with each pros and cons.
When you say "beefier hot spot than the Klarus", are you saying that the HD Super hot spot is bigger/wider than that of the Klarus? If I understand correctly, the consensus, as you said, is that the HD Super has a larger, more useful spill, while still supplies a lot of throw power. On the other hand, the Klarus is a pure thrower, which has a more pencil beam.
May I muddy the waters with a Malkoff 18650 Hound Dog... I have a Super, but I use it stays in the vehicle... with a quick detach mount to go on a carbine. The 18650 HD, in my humble opinion, is much more carry friendly and still reaches out plenty.
Side note: If you want to play with a Rotary, PM me. I'll send you one to try out and it will only cost you return shipping.
Mr. Malkoff about the HD Super, HD XM-L2, and HD 18650. He said that both the HD Super and HD XM-L2 will stay close to the intial lux output throughout the battery life, while the HD 18650 lux will drop overtime. I prefer the former. Also, the HD Super is closer to a backup/hobby to me, which means I don't need to access it as fast and easily as the main EDC one.
Regarding the Rotary, thank you! I really don't want to bother you or anyone that much. It's the knowledge and input of members like you that allows me to understand better my needs and wants.