my measurement shows a remaining sidewall thickness of
0.25-0.3 mm, thats why I always add that "structural integrity"
problem.
But also I type that my 6P still works and survives regular rugged use like clamped to bars while MTB trail riding.
as my Streamlight Argo Hp, modded to 18650 by "boring" the body, just died from the opposite part snapping off (too much force when I wanted to get the end cap off), I feel better when telling that problem to ppl that want to have the boring done. Sure the plastic of the Argo is much weaker than SFs Aluminium.
PS: I would BET that it is no problem to grip the bored 6P at the head and break the end part off by simply doing a slight "hammer" motion with hitting the table
and for sure I type now that I think it is absolute BS that a bored 6P survived being run over with a car.
With different body and head diameters even the really rugged 6P (in original state, not bored one) will eventually encounter problems to survice a car, at least more than f.e. a L1D or Jetbeam Jet III Pro ST, or any other light that features a single diameter.
With the 6P all the weight is added at just a few spots and does not spread over the whole light.
Have a link showing pics of that "runover" that someone boosted to have done to his light?
(its BS, because there is a cance the light gets damaged, who does that?)
[edit]
now, while taking measurements at my 6P to check my "remaining sidewall thickness" data from above, I think I do not believe that runover part: even a P6 in fully unmodded state --> the tailcap will be bent, at least pushed enough into the threads, that operating it will be affected
(and I am thinking of european cars, not the monsters You ppl drive
[/edit]