I have an M31W (for 2xAA in the three-cell SF's) and really like it.
My 2xAA runtime tests here on page 8 and page 9. Lots more info in the Malkoff M31 thread.What kind of AA's are you using?
What kind of realllllll runtime are you getting?
site:candlepowerforums.com M61 M60 pics
I think a very good runtime estimate for the M61 on a 2600 mAh AW 18650 would be 2 - 2.5 hrs, but you raise a good question with regards to the runtime in regulation vs the additional usable runtime during declining output. I'm confident in my theoretical calculation comparisons in the post of mine that you cite, except that was for a theoretical drain rate that is about twice that of the M61. There shouldn't be much deviation at the ~3.5 - 4 W drain rate of the M61 - the bottom line is that the AW 18650 can provide about ~75% more watt hours than 2x CR123 for most reasonable drain rates - this should provide you the runtime you need.[...] Can I get > 150 lumen for > 2 hours off a single 2400mAh or 2600mAh AW 18650? (If the answer is no, then it likely doesn't make any sense for me to travel this road at all! Edit: I guess this theoretical post from Kestrel may go to answering my question but would love some confirmation.)
1. I frequently see output tests for the first second, ten seconds and later. I'm much more interested in what the output looks like after the module has been running continuously for 10 minutes, 30 minutes, 90 minutes and more. Is it realistic to run an M61 continuously in a body/bezel like the MD2 or SureFire C2/6P? Would you feel comfortable doing so, repeatedly replacing cells as needed, all night long?
2. Has anyone done an output-runtime chart for the M61 running on different cell configurations? I'm really interested in the "bright enough" component of the output trace on an 18650. Gene's site only lists runtimes for primaries. I understand that as the 18650 cell drops in voltage eventually the M61 will fall out of regulation and enter direct drive.
How long is that period of regulation? And how much longer will the output remain > 200 lumen? > 170 lumen? > 130 lumen? > 100 lumen? Even rough guesses on only a couple output levels would be really helpful to me.
I got to play with the M61W last night and compare it to my M60W and M60WL.
It's exactly what they advertised, a neutral tint M61. It's considerably brighter than my M60W, about the same hotspot (perhaps a slight bit brighter) with a lot more spill. It's also considerably colder. It's a pure white beam without a hint of blue, green, yellow or red. I would say it's exactly as advertised, a true neutral tint.
It's not a replacement for the M60W. There is nothing even remotely warm about it. I took it outside last night and Browns, Reds, and even Greens look pretty much as crappy as they do under any other typical cold led.
Guess I need to watch this space carefully. I'd discounted the M61W because of beam shots I'd seen of the M60W which looked very very warm to me. I'm attracted to neutral to ever so slightly warm.
So the (your) M61WLL is warmer than the M61W & M61WL & compareable to the M60W line?!?!?!? Did he change the LED? Or was it just luck of the draw? I would looooooooooooooooooooooooove to get an M61WLL. But I have read so so so so so many reviews saying the M61W line really isn't warm. Even the pics that are posted on here, some show a clear blue tint! How is that warm?
The Mx1W's were originally 5000K (for output). After some consideration and feedback I have switched to 4000K.
Gene M has posted that he is changing the emitter in the M61W to 4000K. This will unfortunately cause yet more confusion IMO if this substitution is done 'in line', with no product differentiation.
Conclusion, buy an M61W quickly, before it gets too warm.