If you have no idea, why are you presenting information as if you were an authority on the subject?
Given the same light output (XR-E Q4 or Q5 and Rebel-100) The XR-E and Rebel will produce around the same amount of heat when driven at the same current level. In fact, the rebel may produce a touch less heat due to the tendency for them to have a lower Vf.
The rebel is a much smaller package than the XR-E, which means that it's more difficult to get good thermal transfer. The time limits on turbo mode are likely a reflection of the difficulty in getting good thermal transfer from a Rebel.
If you're wondering about reliability data, in this area, the rebel is in fact likely better than the XR-E.
According to Cree, the XR-E has a lifetime of 50,000 hours to 70% initial output, with Tj at or below 80C. (
http://www.cree.com/products/pdf/XLamp7090XR-E.pdf, page 9)
No where within their documentation (datasheet or reliability data) do they specify the affects of drive current on lumen maintenance.
However, lumileds gives a much more detailed picture about the lifetime of the Rebel. According to this:
http://www.luxeon.com/pdfs/RD07.pdf, the Rebel has a lifespan of 60,000 hours to 70% initial output, with Tj at or below 138C (350mA), or 130C (1A). So the Rebel has better high temperature lifespan, and you can see the effects of higher temperatures and higher drive current on lifespan from the documentation provided.