HarryN
Flashlight Enthusiast
Hi,
I have kind of an interesting question, that others must be facing. My daughter and her husband recently moved to Oakland, CA, and rented a very nice condo in a reasonably safe area. (not an easy thing to find in Oakland) They planned to stay for at least 3 years, and signed a 1 year rental agrement with the son of the owner. (I have not seen the contract as to the exact terms and signatures)
Now that they have been in it for less than 3 months, it has become clear that the property is in foreclosure, and Bank of America is going to re-posses it, through a third party firm - very soon. Neither the bank, nor the 3rd party firm will tell the renters anything, as they are not part of the loan.
After some more discussions with the son (a realtor), his mother lives in another country, and it seems that no one ever made a payment on the property, at least in part, because it sold to "her" for twice its current value.
We suspect that the son will try to now - re-buy it from the bank at auction for the reduced price, but this is speculation. In the meantime, my daughter and son-in-law are confused about what to do, but are pretty certain of a few things. a) They will never see their deposit b) At some point, they will be forced to move.
A family friend (also a realtor) advised them that they will be kicked out within 90 days, so they should just stop paying rent to the "owner's" son - now.
My wife believes that if the new buyer is not planning to live in the property, then they can legally stay for the duration of the contract. She advised them to keep paying rent so they don't ruin their great credit rating.
Of course, we can hire a real estate lawyer for advice, and probably will, but I was curious what others have experienced.
Thanks
HarryN
I have kind of an interesting question, that others must be facing. My daughter and her husband recently moved to Oakland, CA, and rented a very nice condo in a reasonably safe area. (not an easy thing to find in Oakland) They planned to stay for at least 3 years, and signed a 1 year rental agrement with the son of the owner. (I have not seen the contract as to the exact terms and signatures)
Now that they have been in it for less than 3 months, it has become clear that the property is in foreclosure, and Bank of America is going to re-posses it, through a third party firm - very soon. Neither the bank, nor the 3rd party firm will tell the renters anything, as they are not part of the loan.
After some more discussions with the son (a realtor), his mother lives in another country, and it seems that no one ever made a payment on the property, at least in part, because it sold to "her" for twice its current value.
We suspect that the son will try to now - re-buy it from the bank at auction for the reduced price, but this is speculation. In the meantime, my daughter and son-in-law are confused about what to do, but are pretty certain of a few things. a) They will never see their deposit b) At some point, they will be forced to move.
A family friend (also a realtor) advised them that they will be kicked out within 90 days, so they should just stop paying rent to the "owner's" son - now.
My wife believes that if the new buyer is not planning to live in the property, then they can legally stay for the duration of the contract. She advised them to keep paying rent so they don't ruin their great credit rating.
Of course, we can hire a real estate lawyer for advice, and probably will, but I was curious what others have experienced.
Thanks
HarryN