All the new smoke detectors I've seen recently have a built in non-replaceable lithium 9v that lasts 10 years. You're supposed to replace the detector every 10 years anyway, so it makes sense to me. I wouldn't bother with rechargeable batteries.
:buddies:
eek...I hope these manufacturers know that the 241Am embedded in those alarms has a half-life of 432.2 years.
I'm pretty sure existing alarms will tell you change it every month or every 6 months. I run them down in my pak-lite when they do chirp:twothumbs
Smoke alarm batteries need that high voltage to sound the alarm when the photoreciever does close the circuit, but 99.99% of the time they die from the quiescent current drawn from the circuit. I'm pretty sure its in the <100 µA range because the PP3 [or the ANSI standard 1604A] batteries in alkaline form has only approx 550mah of juice, Carbon-zinc as about 350mah, but thats a conservative estimate.
It sounds perfect for carbon zinc cells because thats what they're designed for: low current draw, long load time. Alkalines are half and half because they tend to [in my observation with 5 kidde alarms in the house, 3 of them beside my lithium pile] self discharge faster than the carbon zincs [and therefore chirp sooner] within the same amount of time before I change it [~1yr].
No point at all going for rechargeables because NiMH 9Vs are like ~150mah [if even close]
I suppose you could build a smoke alarm circuit [using the photodiode and cross screen method, not the method involving 0.9 μCi of Americium-241] using single cells, but good luck finding a low voltage, low current buzzer that can sound loud enough to go past a couple closed doors. Even if you do manager to take it that far, the quiescent [standby] current with the photodiode running will deplete the AA/AAA in short order before the buzzer even has a swig of the action. If the batteries do get depleted beyond the ability to inform you that their depleted, then your really in trouble.
I think the smoke alarm is the best standby circuit available, theres a reason why smoke alarms from the early 90s looks the same as ones made in the late 90s: it can't be improved anymore:shrug:
If you really want to do some tinkering, heres a photodiode circuit
I like your idea though, I hope one day I can do the same and build a smoke alarm circuit that runs on CR123as, having not only a buzzer but a built in thrower light so I can yank it off the wall and use it to escape.