You are correct, this happened with new batteries.
Exactly what batteries were you using?
You are correct, this happened with new batteries.
Exactly what batteries were you using?
Thread bump.
With the newer XPG2 units,do we expect better runtime? Or are they supposed to have flatter regulation?
If there is further confirmation, it could be "EB1 used XP-E then ???".EB2 and E2D used OSRAM Oslon Square
EB1 used XP-E
E1D used XP-G2
Thanks. Do you know why SF didn't use the Oslon Square on the single cell lights? Cost perhaps?
The Oslon Square can be driven at 1.8A and that's just the recommended level. It's pretty efficient too, if I'm not mistaken.
I truly loved the beam and slightly greenish tint *gasp* of my EB2.
Also wanted to say that your reviews are invaluable. Some of the best stuff out there on SF lights.
IsaacL, please no more BOLD font unless used occasionally for emphasis. Thanks,
Bill
The latest EB1 appears to use the same emitter as the first generation versions. I posted a crummy photo over in the EB1 Review thread but it at least shows the relative sizes of the emitters.
However, I wouldn't be surprised at all if SureFire switches the EB1 over to the same setup as the E1DL. It's unlike them to have such similar packages with completely different LEDs and/or drivers. But who knows? :shrug:
Maybe marketing got ahead...200 lumens / 6,400 candela = 500 lumens / 16,000 candela, suggesting that the EB1 should/would use the same LED as the EB2.