Maglite 2d pro vs 2d with malkoff

american

Enlightened
Joined
Mar 17, 2010
Messages
782
What's better pro is 30 bucks and 270 lumens malkoff is 40 bucks plus 16 for a 2d same amount of lumens
 

StorminMatt

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
2,263
Location
Norcal
Malkoff, BY FAR! Because Mag has retained the cammed focusing system (a relic from their incandescents) in their LED lights, the emitter needs to be able to move. This means it can't be fixed to a proper heatsink, which means the light has to power back to prevent overheating of the emitter. Simply put, with the Pro, you only get those 270 lumens for a short time before brightness has to drop. On the other hand, with the Malkoff, you get full brightness for as long as your batteries can support it. The Malkoff unit does still allow some degree of focusing, but it's not nearly as slick as on the stock Mag. However, I'm gladly willing to pay that price (and the increased price of the light + drop-in) for a good, bright light.
 

StorminMatt

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
2,263
Location
Norcal
The black dot in the beam too?

You can certainly focus away the donut hole with the Malkoff drop-in. You may just have to turn the head more. Remember that with the Malkoff, the LED can't slide in and out (which is a GOOD thing). Therefore, the only movement of the reflector with respect to the LED is due to the threads of the head itself. But the threads certainly allow the head to move a great deal.

If you want a better beam quality, you can get an orange peel reflector. Kaidomain sells these for about $10. And they work REALLY well. I would HIGHLY recommend it (and a glass lens as well). That's actually another advantage to going Malkoff rather than getting the Mag Pro - you can't get an orange peel reflector for the Mag Pro.
 

Redhat703

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Messages
396
Maglite 4D with Malkoff M61W, the best combination:hitit:. I just finished putting them together and couldn't be happier...
 

StorminMatt

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
2,263
Location
Norcal
Maglite 4D with Malkoff M61W, the best combination:hitit:. I just finished putting them together and couldn't be happier...

Just curious. Given the fact that this is going to be more difficult to install, output is going to be less than their XP-G2 drop-ins for Mags, and price is almost as high as their XM-L2 drop-in (which is AWESOME), what advantage is there to going this route?
 

Redhat703

Enlightened
Joined
Sep 23, 2005
Messages
396
Just curious. Given the fact that this is going to be more difficult to install, output is going to be less than their XP-G2 drop-ins for Mags, and price is almost as high as their XM-L2 drop-in (which is AWESOME), what advantage is there to going this route?
I have several incan Mag 2D, 3D, 4D. In the other hand, I have bought bunch of Malkoff drop-ins M31, M61, and M361. It would be nice if I could take a drop in in a SF host (when batteries run out) and put it in a Mag 3D or 4D and run it with D batteries.
With drop-in specifically made for Mags, I can't take it to put it in a SF host:).
 

StorminMatt

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
2,263
Location
Norcal
I think the Pro uses an XP-G. But I'm not completely sure. The standard Mag LED uses an XP-E. In any case, the Malkoff uses an XP-G2.
 

StarHalo

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
10,927
Location
California Republic
The Malkoff has potted electronics (the entire circuitboard is entombed in epoxy, ultra shock-proof.) But anything D-cell is so large that ~300 lumens will seem a bit tepid for the size of the flashlight - I'd rather shell out the extra dough for the Malkoff XM-L.
 

StorminMatt

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
2,263
Location
Norcal
But anything D-cell is so large that ~300 lumens will seem a bit tepid for the size of the flashlight - I'd rather shell out the extra dough for the Malkoff XM-L.

The 'problem' with the XM-L2 drop-in is that it requires 3-4 cells. So you couldn't run it in a 2D unless you used some nonstandard battery configuration (like 3 C cells, one 32650, etc). Another option is to get the XM-L2 drop-in for the 3-4C rather than the D cell drop-in. This way, you don't need to make modifications to a 2D to fit 3 C cells. You also get an XM-L2 in a light that is only a little longer than the 2D and, at least in my opinion, MUCH nicer to handle.
 

StorminMatt

Flashlight Enthusiast
Joined
Oct 30, 2012
Messages
2,263
Location
Norcal
Eh, it'd be worth cutting the spring for rechargeable cells..

Why, when you can just get a 3C and use the XM-L2 drop-in for that light with no fuss? It's not like the 2D is THAT special of a light. I actually find it MUCH less ergonomic.
 

StarHalo

Flashaholic
Joined
Dec 4, 2007
Messages
10,927
Location
California Republic
Why, when you can just get a 3C and use the XM-L2 drop-in for that light with no fuss?

Just personal preference, different strokes; the 2D will take all manner of battery holders, and it can have a taillight:

idQ5CgfwbiKIp.jpg
 
Top