Yes.
Bill
Bill, is the "yes" to it's a characteristic common to all stock T1A's or "yes" to returning it to SF for replacement? My thought is the former (i.e., it's a characteristic common to all stock T1A's), but I thought I'd ask.
Yes.
Bill
Bill, is the "yes" to it's a characteristic common to all stock T1A's or "yes" to returning it to SF for replacement? My thought is the former (i.e., it's a characteristic common to all stock T1A's), but I thought I'd ask.
and on 'low' as well?Does anyone know the mA draw by the emitter on high?
I agree that your data suggests a buck/boost driver, but why wouldn't SF just use a simpler boost driver for this light?I got 750mA's at the tailcap with a SF CR123 on high, and 590mA's with an RCR123 charged to 4.10. Looks like a buck circuit. That was an original T1A unmodded.
Correction, probably buck/boost.
I bought a second T1A. I have noticed some residual sticky stuff on the outside of the lens. I had what was probably the same thing on the body in a couple places, but some lighter fluid took care of that easily. This stuff may be due to the foam packaging that the light was in.
The SF website says that the lens is coated. Does anyone know if it is coated on the outside, inside, or both? I am hesitant to do anyting to the lens if it is coated on the outside. I'll be emailing SF, but I thought it appropriate to ask here.
A T2A would be great if it got a clicky tailcap, sort of like a mini-U2. I'd buy one.Supporting the T2A idea, as well as a T1AA.
I'd like to see a TCR2ASupporting the T2A idea, as well as a T1AA.
I'm in for a TLR44A :devil:I'd like to see a TCR2A![]()