FliGuyRyan
Enlightened
Re: 1 cell AAA, Low/Med/High mode, bright, and not the Preon... twisty or clicky...
I don't like the Preon. That's that... I'm not trying to be offensive - or sound ungrateful for your suggestions - but, I don't think it was well executed. Yes, this is my opinion, and I haven't even touched one, but research on here shows a lot of people don't like the clicky (and a lot of people do I understand that) and I am one of them because it's activated too easily. If it wasn't, I'd be all about the Preon. I don't like a protruding button, I like one that is shrouded and "protected" again accidental turn on as well as having the all-too-often-used feature of candle standing. It just doesn't really make sense to me why a button would be designed this way when it's known to go in one's pocket. Especially when it's not given a good amount of resistance.
Now, you'll say, "Well, you haven't tried it." True. Very true. I'm sure I would be awe-inspired by the brightness and the beauty of this little light. But I like function over form. And the function of the Preon isn't following its form in my opinion. What I do know is that if people are talking about how easily it's activated in a pocket, then I would be one of the people who would go to use it and find it dead upon initial turn on. If I can activate my OpticsHQ "protected" and shrouded tail-cap button, then I know I would activate the Preon's sitting-out-in-the-open-waiting-to-be-pressed-button.
That's my rant... didn't mean to go there, but that's my opinion.
(*No fellow forum members were harmed during the making of this rant...)
-RC
(Warning: if you're not into my rant about the Preon, please proceed to the next post... you were warned)
I don't like the concept of the twisty on the Preon because I'm being very picky. Since the clicky doesn't work (comes on in pocket, and I have wallet, cell phone on left, and light and keys in the right pocket), then I don't want to fool with the twisty. Sounds odd, but I want a light designed well from the beginning. If he updates his design to a harder switch on the back so it doesn't come on in the pocket (or make a rubber or metal shroud for it - recessed) then I'd be in. But... that's life. I'm picky like that. My SF Z2 with OpticsHQ tailcap comes on in my pocket sometimes (that's why I ordered the side switch to be the momentary). This makes sense. Good UI. The Preon isn't doing it for me right now.
I like the idea of the Quark Mini, IlluminaTi and the Lite Flux. Now it's which one...
I don't like the Preon. That's that... I'm not trying to be offensive - or sound ungrateful for your suggestions - but, I don't think it was well executed. Yes, this is my opinion, and I haven't even touched one, but research on here shows a lot of people don't like the clicky (and a lot of people do I understand that) and I am one of them because it's activated too easily. If it wasn't, I'd be all about the Preon. I don't like a protruding button, I like one that is shrouded and "protected" again accidental turn on as well as having the all-too-often-used feature of candle standing. It just doesn't really make sense to me why a button would be designed this way when it's known to go in one's pocket. Especially when it's not given a good amount of resistance.
Now, you'll say, "Well, you haven't tried it." True. Very true. I'm sure I would be awe-inspired by the brightness and the beauty of this little light. But I like function over form. And the function of the Preon isn't following its form in my opinion. What I do know is that if people are talking about how easily it's activated in a pocket, then I would be one of the people who would go to use it and find it dead upon initial turn on. If I can activate my OpticsHQ "protected" and shrouded tail-cap button, then I know I would activate the Preon's sitting-out-in-the-open-waiting-to-be-pressed-button.
That's my rant... didn't mean to go there, but that's my opinion.
(*No fellow forum members were harmed during the making of this rant...)
-RC